feat(arch-linux): init

[claymorwan]

🎉 Theme for Arch user repository 🎉

The Arch user repository (aur) is a community-driven repository of packages for Arch Linux.

💬 Additional Comments 💬

I had a bit of struggle making this theme since it was my first time working with userstyles, but I made it in a day so it's fine. My only problem at the moment is changing the logo for a themed one, or at least a transparent one.

🗒 Checklist 🗒

• I have read and followed Catppuccin's submission guidelines.
• I have made a new directory underneath /styles/<name-of-website> containing the contents of the /template directory.
  • I have ensured that the new directory is in lower-kebab-case.
  • I have followed the template and kept the preprocessor as LESS.
• I have made sure to update the
  userstyles.yml
  file with information about the new userstyle.
• I have included the following files:
  • catppuccin.user.css - all the CSS for the userstyle, based on the
    template.
  • preview.webp - composite image of all four individual flavor screenshots (taken with the default accent color of mauve) stitched together, generated via Catwalk.

[GenShibe]

In terms of the logo, my first thought is to take the SVG off of the arch wiki style, and then using that as a base to add the words "user repository"

[claymorwan]

Well I already took the argo logo and changed the accent color, tho I haven't been able to insert it correctly and hide the original logo

Btw I think I gotta do a new commit to fix the requested changes or nah ? I don't do pr often so idk

[claymorwan]

Ok I think I got everything fixed

[isabelroses]

First off, thanks for the PR :).

It would be nice to theme visited links.

The red here is not catppuccin themed.

Package keywords are a bit hard to read, and would likely be worse if my accent matched the blue, could we use crust on those.

[claymorwan]

I think I fixed everything now, tho idk about that conflict, tried to fix it by adding what was conflicting to the file

[claymorwan]

I think I fixed everything now, tho idk about that conflict, tried something but didn't worked

[claymorwan]

why's it broken again

[claymorwan]

Chat is it gud

[mustafakhalaf-git]

I'm not sure why you've requested a review from me, but either way looks good.

Though I thought we already had an aur theme, or was that for the wiki?

[uncenter]

I'm not sure why you've requested a review from me, but either way looks good.

Though I thought we already had an aur theme, or was that for the wiki?

They accidentally deleted the folder for the Stylus userstyle, triggering the CI to request a review from you since you maintain that.

And yes we did, it was for the wiki. If you follow the chain of events above I suggested combining the proposed Arch User Repository userstyle with the existing Arch Wiki userstyle to create a unified Arch Linux userstyle, and that is what we have now here.

[mustafakhalaf-git]

I suggested combining the proposed Arch User Repository userstyle with the existing Arch Wiki userstyle to create a unified Arch Linux userstyle, and that is what we have now here.

Sounds good.

[claymorwan]

So do I have to do stuff again for the pr or nah ?

[uncenter]

So do I have to do stuff again for the pr or nah ?

Nothing right now, just needs reviewing.

[claymorwan]

So do I have to do stuff again for the pr or nah ?

Nothing right now, just needs reviewing.

Oki, I'll be waiting then

[claymorwan]

O wairt bu reviewing does that mean Inhabe to do the "request review" thingy

[uncenter]

Nope, nothing you need to do right now.

[isabelroses]

The text colour here should be subtext0

reproduction link: https://archlinux.org/news/mkinitcpio-hook-migration-and-early-microcode/

This should be text, its on the main page

The green here is wrong

repro link: https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/syslog-ng/

Link hover shouldn't be so grey

repro url: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewforum.php?id=23

the wiki seems to have some issues with the icons

[claymorwan]

The text colour here should be subtext0

Fixed that.

This should be text, its on the main page

I can't change that one, for some reason only 2 pages has the .anb-selected class name, so until they add it to all pages I can't do something about it (unless there's another that idk). In the meantime I changed them all to subtext0 and the selected one will have to be page's white text color.

The green here is wrong

Couldn't find the class name or id for it cuz idk where to find a recently updated package (this green text doesn't seems to be on the aur).

Link hover shouldn't be so grey

Istg I tried everything, but I can't change that hover color, I an changer the background color on hover but not the text color.

the wiki seems to have some issues with the icons

These are on the wiki page and were already broken with the old arch wiki theme. I tried to fixed them but couldn't.

[uncenter]

Please stop updating this branch it pings everyone involved.

[claymorwan]

O sorry, I thought I was supposed it keep it updated, my bad

[isabelroses]

On archwiki this seems broken.

Also the current archwiki themes the active navbar page with the accent colour.

Hovering links also looks somewhat poor, perhaps we could darken the accent colour?

[claymorwan]

On archwiki this seems broken.

If u're talking about the icon then I can't change that, it was like that with the old arch wiki theme and I haven't found a way to change it

Also the current archwiki themes the active navbar page with the accent colour.

If you're talking about changing the white to accent color, I can only do that to like 2-3 of the pages, cuz these have a class name for when they're selected, the other pages doesn't tho

Hovering links also looks somewhat poor, perhaps we could darken the accent colour?
So like change the hover color to every link ?