Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency libjuju 2 to v2.9.44.1 #139

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 7, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
libjuju 2 2.9.44.0 -> 2.9.44.1 ![age](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/age/pypi/libjuju 2/2.9.44.1?slim=true) ![adoption](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/adoption/pypi/libjuju 2/2.9.44.1?slim=true) ![passing](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/compatibility/pypi/libjuju 2/2.9.44.0/2.9.44.1?slim=true) ![confidence](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/confidence/pypi/libjuju 2/2.9.44.0/2.9.44.1?slim=true)

Release Notes

juju/python-libjuju (libjuju 2)

v2.9.44.1

Compare Source

What's Changed

This is a patch release on the 2.9 track. Most significant change is the added support for nested assumes expressions in #​940.

Full Changelog: juju/python-libjuju@2.9.44.0...2.9.44.1


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 1am and before 2am every weekday" in timezone Etc/UTC, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@dragomirp dragomirp merged commit e16fd99 into main Sep 7, 2023
18 checks passed
@dragomirp dragomirp deleted the renovate/juju-2 branch September 7, 2023 23:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants