Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: expose metrics port using kubernetes_service_patch lib (#332) #333

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor

@DnPlas DnPlas commented Feb 13, 2024

  • fix: expose metrics port using kubernetes_service_patch lib

This commit ensures the metrics port is exposed in the Kubernetes Service for the jupyter-controller using the kubernetes_service_patch lib. This makes the metrics endpoint reachable from external prometheus scraper.
This commit also changes the unit tests slightly to adapt to the added service patcher.

Part of canonical/bundle-kubeflow#564

  • tests: add an assertion for checking unit is available

The test_prometheus_grafana_integration test case was doing queries to prometheus and checking the request returned successfully and that the application name and model was listed correctly. To make this test case more accurately, we can add an assertion that also checks that the unit is available, this way we avoid issues like the one described in canonical/bundle-kubeflow#564.

Part of canonical/bundle-kubeflow#564

* fix: expose metrics port using kubernetes_service_patch lib

This commit ensures the metrics port is exposed in the Kubernetes Service for the jupyter-controller
using the kubernetes_service_patch lib. This makes the metrics endpoint reachable from external
prometheus scraper.
This commit also changes the unit tests slightly to adapt to the added service patcher.

Part of canonical/bundle-kubeflow#564

* tests: add an assertion for checking unit is available

The test_prometheus_grafana_integration test case was doing queries to prometheus
and checking the request returned successfully and that the application name and model
was listed correctly. To make this test case more accurately, we can add an assertion that
also checks that the unit is available, this way we avoid issues like the one described in
canonical/bundle-kubeflow#564.

Part of canonical/bundle-kubeflow#564
@DnPlas DnPlas added the backport Backport a change from main into branch label Feb 13, 2024
@DnPlas DnPlas requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2024 12:51
@DnPlas DnPlas merged commit e82ce16 into track/1.8 Feb 14, 2024
14 checks passed
@DnPlas DnPlas deleted the KF-1647-backport-fix-564 branch February 14, 2024 15:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Backport a change from main into branch Libraries: Out of sync
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants