Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
slicer/test: Support for custom packages #80
slicer/test: Support for custom packages #80
Changes from 1 commit
0d5d78c
e453348
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Neither in the type definition nor here do we have a hint of what these strings actually mean.
This also seems slightly misleading because the testPackage is actually a slice here, isn't it?No, it's a deb. So it's archive and packages.We have @rebornplusplus above hinting as this issue too. I'm not sure his suggestion is the best idea either, but it would be nice to make things slightly cleaner. Any suggestions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@niemeyer I've applied @rebornplusplus's suggestion and in the end, I like the result. The definition now looks like:
I've made archive packages a list instead of a map because one archive can in theory contain packages of the same name with different versions and/or architectures. It also reduces one level of indentation.
Note that there's also
testArchive
structure which implementsArchive
interface. That's why I suffixed the new structures withData
, though I admit it's kind of a fallback naming...The changes are in a new fixup commit. Does it look better now?