Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update language around collapsed subprocesses #4711

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

nloding
Copy link
Contributor

@nloding nloding commented Dec 3, 2024

Description

There has been some confusion about the ability to collapse expanded subprocesses, which is not currently possible. This PR attempts to clarify the language around collapsed subprocesses.

When should this change go live?

  • This is a bug fix, security concern, or something that needs urgent release support.
  • This is already available but undocumented and should be released within a week.
  • This on a specific schedule and the assignee will coordinate a release with the DevEx team. (apply hold label or convert to draft PR)
  • This is part of a scheduled alpha or minor. (apply alpha or minor label)
  • There is no urgency with this change and can be released at any time.

PR Checklist

  • My changes are for an already released minor and are in /versioned_docs directory.
  • My changes are for the next minor and are in /docs directory (aka /next/).

@nloding nloding requested a review from a team December 3, 2024 22:31
Copy link
Contributor

@conceptualshark conceptualshark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks clearer to me - thank you!

@akeller akeller merged commit 8b5cbe5 into main Dec 4, 2024
9 checks passed
@akeller akeller deleted the nloding-collapsed-subprocesses branch December 4, 2024 19:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants