-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 274
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(user-guide): separate History and History cleanup pages #1580
Conversation
Made changes:
|
content/reference/deployment-descriptors/tags/process-engine.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
I will send the PR for technical writer review too. |
Reviewed the link for custom history level, looks good 👍 |
Hi @christinaausley, I would like to request a Technical writer review. Make changes overview: #1580 (comment)
Best, |
|
||
--- | ||
|
||
# Provide a custom history backend |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can't have H1 headers to open our docs, so this should start with an H2. Can you adjust across this doc, and I'll have another look over the content?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could be wrong here, in that we can do this within our C7 docs, but wanted to flag in case the structuring is off.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really big work here, nice job and thank you for getting started!
Are you solely looking for review of the headers here? Or content as well? When does this need to go live/what is your deadline? I want to take my time reviewing this, but don't want to block anything in the works.
6e677f0
to
1be9c11
Compare
As discussed, the PR has focus on splitting the History page, so I look for feedback on the headers and pages. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm good with this 👍
Do you have any user feedback on the headers, or that they feel they aren't comprehensive? I would wait to change them (though I don't see a need quite yet) so users can get used to the new layout anyways.
No, nothing specific. I will pay attention in the forum and tickets if anything pops up after we apply the above changes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great job! Couldn't find anything missing or broken 👍
PS: There is a conflict that needs to be resolved.
Conflict will be resolved in next commits: |
* document mandatory TTL * adjust paragraph names * adjust references * add link to custom history level * new pages: * History configuration * User operation log * History cleanup * Custom implementation * index page will be loaded when link to the old page can't be resolved camunda/camunda-bpm-platform#4031
ab26d18
to
caab31e
Compare
camunda/camunda-bpm-platform#4031
TODO:
Tasks