Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Security] Bump puma from 3.12.0 to 4.3.8 #102

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot-preview[bot]
Copy link

Bumps puma from 3.12.0 to 4.3.8. This update includes security fixes.

Vulnerabilities fixed

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Moderate severity vulnerability that affects puma

Keepalive thread overload/DoS

Impact

A poorly-behaved client could use keepalive requests to monopolize Puma's reactor and create a denial of service attack.

If more keepalive connections to Puma are opened than there are threads available, additional connections will wait permanently if the attacker sends requests frequently enough.

Patches

This vulnerability is patched in Puma 4.3.1 and 3.12.2.

Workarounds

Reverse proxies in front of Puma could be configured to always allow less than X keepalive connections to a Puma cluster or process, where X is the number of threads configured in Puma's thread pool.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

... (truncated)

Affected versions: < 3.12.2

Sourced from The Ruby Advisory Database.

Keepalive thread overload/DoS in puma A poorly-behaved client could use keepalive requests to monopolize Puma's reactor and create a denial of service attack.

If more keepalive connections to Puma are opened than there are threads available, additional connections will wait permanently if the attacker sends requests frequently enough.

Patched versions: ~> 3.12.2; >= 4.3.1 Unaffected versions: none

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Moderate severity vulnerability that affects puma In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.2 and 3.12.2, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in a response header, an attacker can use newline characters (i.e. CR, LF or/r, /n) to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting.

While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS).

This is related to CVE-2019-16254, which fixed this vulnerability for the WEBrick Ruby web server.

This has been fixed in versions 4.3.2 and 3.12.3 by checking all headers for line endings and rejecting headers with those characters.

Affected versions: < 3.12.3

Sourced from The Ruby Advisory Database.

HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability in puma If an application using Puma allows untrusted input in a response header, an attacker can use newline characters (i.e. CR, LF) to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting.

While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS).

Patched versions: ~> 3.12.4; >= 4.3.3 Unaffected versions: none

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Moderate severity vulnerability that affects puma

Impact

If an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting

While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS).

This is related to CVE-2020-5247, which fixed this vulnerability but only for regular responses.

Patches

This has been fixed in 4.3.3 and 3.12.4.

Workarounds

Users can not allow untrusted/user input in the Early Hints response header.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Affected versions: < 3.12.4

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

Impact

This is a similar but different vulnerability to the one patched in 3.12.5 and 4.3.4.

A client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client.

If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the first request's body. Puma, however, would see it as two requests, and when processing the second request, send back a response that the proxy does not expect. If the proxy has reused the persistent connection to Puma to send another request for a different client, the second response from the first client will be sent to the second client.

Patches

The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.6 and Puma 4.3.5.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Affected versions: < 3.12.6

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

Impact

By using an invalid transfer-encoding header, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response.

Originally reported by @​ZeddYu, who has our thanks for the detailed report.

Patches

The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Affected versions: < 3.12.5

Sourced from The Ruby Advisory Database.

HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

Impact

By using an invalid transfer-encoding header, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response.

Patches

The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4.

Patched versions: ~> 3.12.5; >= 4.3.4 Unaffected versions: none

Sourced from The Ruby Advisory Database.

HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

Impact

This is a similar but different vulnerability to the one patched in 3.12.5 and 4.3.4.

A client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client.

If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the first request's body. Puma, however, would see it as two requests, and when processing the second request, send back a response that the proxy does not expect. If the proxy has reused the persistent connection to Puma to send another request for a different client, the second response from the first client will be sent to the second client.

Patches

The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.6 and Puma 4.3.5.

Patched versions: ~> 3.12.6; >= 4.3.5 Unaffected versions: none

Sourced from The Ruby Advisory Database.

HTTP Response Splitting (Early Hints) in Puma

Impact

If an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting

While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS).

This is related to CVE-2020-5247, which fixed this vulnerability but only for regular responses.

Patches

This has been fixed in 4.3.3 and 3.12.4.

Workarounds

Users can not allow untrusted/user input in the Early Hints response header.

Patched versions: ~> 3.12.4; >= 4.3.3 Unaffected versions: none

Sourced from The Ruby Advisory Database.

HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability in puma If an application using Puma allows untrusted input in a response header, an attacker can use newline characters (i.e. CR, LF) to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting.

While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS).

Patched versions: ~> 3.12.4; >= 4.3.3 Unaffected versions: none

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Keepalive Connections Causing Denial Of Service in puma This vulnerability is related to CVE-2019-16770.

Impact

The fix for CVE-2019-16770 was incomplete. The original fix only protected existing connections that had already been accepted from having their requests starved by greedy persistent-connections saturating all threads in the same process. However, new connections may still be starved by greedy persistent-connections saturating all threads in all processes in the cluster.

A puma server which received more concurrent keep-alive connections than the server had threads in its threadpool would service only a subset of connections, denying service to the unserved connections.

Patches

This problem has been fixed in puma 4.3.8 and 5.3.1.

Workarounds

Setting queue_requests false also fixes the issue. This is not advised when using puma without a reverse proxy, such as nginx or apache, because you will open yourself to slow client attacks (e.g. slowloris).

The fix is very small. A git patch is available here for those using unsupported versions of Puma.

For more information

... (truncated)

Affected versions: <= 4.3.7

Release notes

Sourced from puma's releases.

v4.3.8

  • Security
    • Close keepalive connections after the maximum number of fast inlined requests (#2625)

v4.3.6

puma/puma@v4.3.5...4.3.6

A quick fix for a build error on Mac OS and a JSON require fix for those using phased restart.

  • Explicitly include ctype.h to fix compilation warning and build error on macOS with Xcode 12 (#2304)
  • Don't require json at boot (#2269)

v4.3.0 - Mysterious Traveller

0000492109

Mysterious Traveller

  • Features

    • Strip whitespace at end of HTTP headers (#2010)
    • Optimize HTTP parser for JRuby (#2012)
    • Add SSL support for the control app and cli (#2046, #2052)
  • Bugfixes

    • Fix Errno::EINVAL when SSL is enabled and browser rejects cert (#1564)
    • Fix pumactl defaulting puma to development if an environment was not specified (#2035)
    • Fix closing file stream when reading pid from pidfile (#2048)
    • Fix a typo in configuration option --extra_runtime_dependencies (#2050)

4.2.1

  • 3 bugfixes
    • Fix socket activation of systemd (pre-existing) unix binder files (#1842, #1988)
    • Deal with multiple calls to bind correctly (#1986, #1994, #2006)
    • Accepts symbols for verify_mode (#1222)

4.2.0 - Distant Airhorns

  • 6 features
    • Pumactl has a new -e environment option and reads config/puma/.rb config files (#1885)
    • Semicolons are now allowed in URL paths (MRI only), useful for Angular or Redmine (#1934)
    • Allow extra dependencies to be defined when using prune_bundler (#1105)
    • Puma now reports the correct port when binding to port 0, also reports other listeners when binding to localhost (#1786)
    • Sending SIGINFO to any Puma worker now prints currently active threads and their backtraces (#1320)
    • Puma threads all now have their name set on Ruby 2.3+ (#1968)
  • 4 bugfixes
    • Fix some misbehavior with phased restart and externally SIGTERMed workers (#1908, #1952)
    • Fix socket closing on error (#1941)
    • Removed unnecessary SIGINT trap for JRuby that caused some race conditions (#1961)
    • Fix socket files being left around after process stopped (#1970)
  • Absolutely thousands of lines of test improvements and fixes thanks to @​MSP-Greg

air-horn-sound-s-econd-air-horn-sound-me-this-23916124

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from puma's changelog.

4.3.8 / 2021-05-11

  • Security
    • Close keepalive connections after the maximum number of fast inlined requests (#2625)

4.3.7 / 2020-11-30

  • Bugfixes
    • Backport set CONTENT_LENGTH for chunked requests (Originally: #2287, backport: #2496)

4.3.6 / 2020-09-05

  • Bugfixes
    • Explicitly include ctype.h to fix compilation warning and build error on macOS with Xcode 12 (#2304)
    • Don't require json at boot (#2269)

4.3.4/4.3.5 and 3.12.5/3.12.6 / 2020-05-22

Each patchlevel release contains a separate security fix. We recommend simply upgrading to 4.3.5/3.12.6.

  • Security

4.3.3 and 3.12.4 / 2020-02-28

  • Bugfixes
    • Fix: Fixes a problem where we weren't splitting headers correctly on newlines (#2132)
  • Security
    • Fix: Prevent HTTP Response splitting via CR in early hints. CVE-2020-5249.

4.3.2 and 3.12.3 / 2020-02-27 (YANKED)

  • Security
    • Fix: Prevent HTTP Response splitting via CR/LF in header values. CVE-2020-5247.

4.3.1 and 3.12.2 / 2019-12-05

  • Security
    • Fix: a poorly-behaved client could use keepalive requests to monopolize Puma's reactor and create a denial of service attack. CVE-2019-16770.

4.3.0 / 2019-11-07

  • Features

    • Strip whitespace at end of HTTP headers (#2010)
    • Optimize HTTP parser for JRuby (#2012)
    • Add SSL support for the control app and cli (#2046, #2052)
  • Bugfixes

    • Fix Errno::EINVAL when SSL is enabled and browser rejects cert (#1564)
    • Fix pumactl defaulting puma to development if an environment was not specified (#2035)

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot use these labels will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these reviewers will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these assignees will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use this milestone will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot badge me will comment on this PR with code to add a "Dependabot enabled" badge to your readme

Additionally, you can set the following in your Dependabot dashboard:

  • Update frequency (including time of day and day of week)
  • Pull request limits (per update run and/or open at any time)
  • Out-of-range updates (receive only lockfile updates, if desired)
  • Security updates (receive only security updates, if desired)

Bumps [puma](https://github.com/puma/puma) from 3.12.0 to 4.3.8. **This update includes security fixes.**
- [Release notes](https://github.com/puma/puma/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/puma/puma/blob/master/History.md)
- [Commits](puma/puma@v3.12.0...v4.3.8)

Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot-preview dependabot-preview bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file security Pull requests that address a security vulnerability labels May 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file security Pull requests that address a security vulnerability
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants