Correctly reimplement #177 #1
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
atom#177 does not do what you want: `str1 || str2` returns `str1` if not empty, `str2` otherwise
|
Oops... went to the wrong repo? |
|
Yup, wrong repo ;) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
atom#177 does not do what you want:
str1 || str2returnsstr1if not empty,str2otherwiseRequirements
Description of the Change
A fix for atom#185, by rewriting the atom#177.
Alternate Designs
['source.gfm', 'text.md'].includes(grammarScopeName)Benefits
No more whitespace stripping in Markdown.
Possible Drawbacks
None?
Applicable Issues
atom#185, atom#186, atom#177