-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#203: Wrap POST body as in wiro (closes #203) #212
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3212f1f
Generate wrapper classes for POST bodies
tpetrucciani 5e5510e
Fix GET with no parameters
tpetrucciani 411e96b
Encode string output as JSON
tpetrucciani a6ecd9f
Refactor: use more quasiquoting
tpetrucciani 76d76ca
Introduce enumerated type for route methods
tpetrucciani 2462381
Fix test
tpetrucciani 4e8ed12
Use `isAuthToken` consistently
tpetrucciani 73d3e79
Fix handling of AuthToken in Tapir endpoints
tpetrucciani a1da5c4
Remove duplication + fix token in HttpEndpoints
tpetrucciani fbabd8e
Refactor codecsImplicits
tpetrucciani 7235e8f
Rename variable
tpetrucciani 49ac833
Update and expand tests
tpetrucciani fad617e
Add test for query without parameters
tpetrucciani 80eec9a
Handle review comments
tpetrucciani File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This function is getting quite messy...
Part of the problem is that we're delaying the conversion to scalameta type for each type of codec because we want to call
.distinct
while we still have a list of metarpheus types, because it wouldn't work on scalameta types because==
is by referenceMaybe we could use structural equality from scala.meta.contrib (https://scalameta.org/docs/trees/guide.html#compare-trees-for-equality) to clean this up a bit?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think using
isEqual
is a good ideaThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've tried to rewrite that function and I think it reads a bit better now