Update pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish action to v1.12.3 #20
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
v1.9.0
->v1.12.3
Release Notes
pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish (pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish)
v1.12.3
Compare Source
v1.12.2
Compare Source
🐛 What's Fixed
The fix for signing legacy zip sdists turned out to be incomplete, so @woodruffw💰 promptly produced another follow-up that updated
pypi-attestations
from v0.0.13 to v0.0.15 in #297. This is the only change since the previous release.🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.12.1...v1.12.2
🧔♂️ Release Manager: @webknjaz 🇺🇦
v1.12.1
Compare Source
🐛 What's Fixed
Version v1.12.0 hit several rare corner cases we never considered fully supported, and this release fixes a few of those.
In #294, @webknjaz💰 improved the self-hosted runner experience by pre-installing Python if it's not there, and with #293 the ability to use the action on GitHub Enterprise instances has been restored. The latter should've also fixed the ability to invoke [
pypi-publish
][pypi-publish] from nested in-repo composite actions — another exotic use-case that was never tested in our CI.@woodruffw💰 also managed to squeeze in a last-minute fix for detecting legacy
.zip
sdists while producing attestations via #295.🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.12.0...v1.12.1
🧔♂️ Release Manager: @webknjaz 🇺🇦
🙏 Huge Thanks to all the bug reporters for posting the logs, helping inspect the problems and verify the regression fixes!
v1.12.0
Compare Source
⚡️ Why Should You Update?
This is a minor version bump, but it does not add any new user-facing interfaces. Still, I felt like it should not be a patch-release: this update brings significant changes to the action invocation and internal release process.
Previously, each invocation of [
pypi-publish
][pypi-publish] required building a container image in the invoking CI job. This was inefficient and added about 30 seconds to the publishing jobs at their startup just to build the container.I wanted to improve this for over three years (#58) and a little over half a year ago @br3ndonland💰 stepped up and offered a very comprehensive solution to the limitation I was hoping to overcome: #230.
Going forward, I'm going to pre-build per-version containers prior to cutting each release. And the action invocations will just pull the image from GitHub Container registry.
🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.11.0...v1.12.0
🧔♂️ Release Manager: @webknjaz 🇺🇦
v1.11.0
Compare Source
🔏 Helping you become a trusted supply chain link 🔗
Two months ago, in v1.10.0, @woodruffw💰 integrated support for generating and uploading PEP 740 digital attestations that can be used as provenance objects when analyzing dependency chains for the integrity.
To make sure it works well, it was implemented as an opt-in, so a relatively small subset of projects was able to try it out, and a few issues have been determined and fixed during this time.
That changes today! This version changes the feature toggle to “on by default”. This means that from now on, every project making use of Trusted Publishing will start producing and publishing digital attestations without having to do any modifications to how they use this action.
@woodruffw💰 flipped the respective toggle in #277 with the possibility to opt-out.
🛠️ Internal Dependencies
@woodruffw💰 bumped
sigstore
to v3.5.1 andpypi-attestations
to v0.0.13 in lock files via #276.🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.10.3...v1.11.0
🧔♂️ Release Manager: @webknjaz 🇺🇦
🙏 Special Thanks to William for working on improving the supply chain provenance in the ecosystem! The overall effort is tracked @&#https://github.com/pypi/warehouse/issues/15871/15871.
v1.10.3
Compare Source
💅 Cosmetic Output Improvements
In #270, @facutuesca💰 made a follow-up to their previous PR #250, making the hints show up more granularly. This effectively makes sure that the suggestion to enable Trusted Publishing does not get displayed when it's already in use. It also makes the message nicer in a few places on the UI.
🛠️ Internal Dependencies
@mosfet80💰 updated a few internal linter versions in #266, #267, and #271, no user impact. This is usually automated otherwise.
💪 New Contributors
🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.10.2...v1.10.3
🧔♂️ Release Manager: @webknjaz 🇺🇦
v1.10.2
Compare Source
💅 Cosmetic Output Improvements
In #250 and #258, @facutuesca💰 added a nudge message with a magic link to pre-fill the creation of new Trusted Publishers configurations on PyPI. The users are now suggested to configure tokenless publishing by clicking a link printed in the job summary when it's detected that they publish to PyPI or TestPyPI. Just like magic! 🦄
🛠️ Internal Dependencies
@woodruffw💰 bumped
pypi-attestations
to v0.0.12 in #262, fixing #263.💪 New Contributors
@facutuesca made their first contribution in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/258
🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.10.1...v1.10.2
🧔♂️ Release Manager: @webknjaz 🇺🇦
🙏 Special Thanks to @henryiii💰 for promptly pointing up possible fixes for #263.
v1.10.1
Compare Source
🚑🔏 Oopsie... We missed a tiny bug in the attestations feature the other day
The problem was that the distribution file validity check was failing on any valid distribution being present and ready to be signed. What a silly mistake! It's now been fixed via pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@0ab0b79, though. So everything's good!
-- @webknjaz💰
🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.10.0...v1.10.1
🧔♂️ Release Manager: @webknjaz 🇺🇦
🙏 Special Thanks to @hugovk💰 for promptly validating the bug fix, mere minutes after I pushed it — I even haven't finished writing this text by then!
v1.10.0
Compare Source
🔏 Anything fancy, eh?
This time, @woodruffw💰 implemented support for PEP 740 attestations functionality in #236 and #245. This is a big deal, as it is a huge step forward to replacing what the deprecated GPG signatures used to provide in a more meaningful way.
🙏 And please, thank William for working on this amazing improvement for the ecosystem! The overall effort is tracked @&#https://github.com/pypi/warehouse/issues/15871/15871, by the way.
🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.9.0...v1.10.0
🧔♂️ Release Manager: @webknjaz 🇺🇦
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.