-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initial Version #2
Conversation
Warning Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis update introduces various enhancements, new features, and testing capabilities to the project. It includes GitHub Actions for automated releases, expanded environment variable handling, new tests for utility functions, and improved documentation. The changes also involve refined error handling mechanisms and the addition of a markdown linting configuration. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (28)
- .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
- .gitignore (2 hunks)
- .goreleaser.yml (1 hunks)
- .markdownlint.json (1 hunks)
- LICENSE (2 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- as/as_test.go (1 hunks)
- as/duration.go (1 hunks)
- as/errors.go (1 hunks)
- as/funcs.go (1 hunks)
- as/int.go (1 hunks)
- as/portNo.go (1 hunks)
- as/string.go (1 hunks)
- as/url.go (1 hunks)
- env.go (1 hunks)
- env_test.go (1 hunks)
- errors.go (1 hunks)
- errors_test.go (1 hunks)
- funcs.go (1 hunks)
- go.mod (1 hunks)
- load.go (1 hunks)
- load_test.go (1 hunks)
- parse.go (1 hunks)
- parse_test.go (1 hunks)
- state.go (1 hunks)
- state_test.go (1 hunks)
- vars.go (1 hunks)
- vars_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- .github/workflows/release.yml
- .gitignore
- .goreleaser.yml
- .markdownlint.json
- LICENSE
- as/errors.go
- as/funcs.go
- as/int.go
- funcs.go
- go.mod
Additional context used
LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~107-~107: The phrase ‘feel free to’ is used quite frequently. Consider using a less frequent alternative to set your writing apart from others and make it sound more professional.
Context: ...tributingContributions are welcome! Please feel free to submit a pull request.
License
...
(FEEL_FREE_TO_STYLE_ME)
Additional comments not posted (71)
as/string.go (1)
1-16
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
String
match the new signature with the error return type.Verification successful
Verification successful: Function usage matches the new signature.
The call to the
String
function inas/as_test.go
correctly handles the error return type, aligning with the updated function signature.
as/as_test.go
line 115:result, err := String(sut)
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `String` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature. rg --type go $'String'Length of output: 557
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all calls to the `String` function in the `as` package match the new signature with the error return type. # Search for function calls to `String` in the `as` package ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'String($_)' --json | jq '.captures[] | {file: .file, line: .start_line, code: .text}'Length of output: 186
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all calls to the `String` function in the `as` package match the new signature with the error return type. # Search for function calls to `String` in the `as` package ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'String($_)'Length of output: 91
state_test.go (1)
1-44
: Tests look good!The test functions are well-structured and cover the functionalities of the
State
andReset
methods.as/portNo.go (1)
1-38
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
PortNo
are consistent with the AI-generated context.Verification successful
Function usage verified successfully.
The function
PortNo
is only used in the test cases within the fileas/as_test.go
. There are no other usages of this function in the main codebase, ensuring consistency with the AI-generated context.
as/as_test.go
: Test cases usingPortNo
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `PortNo` are consistent with the AI-generated context. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the current signature. rg --type go $'PortNo'Length of output: 464
as/url.go (1)
1-39
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The function is well-documented and the error handling is appropriate.
vars.go (2)
11-19
: LGTM!The
Names
function is correctly implemented to return sorted variable names.
36-53
: LGTM!The
String
function is correctly implemented to return a sorted, comma-delimited string representation of the variables.as/duration.go (1)
7-48
: LGTM!The
Duration
function is correctly implemented to handle both cases where a unit is provided or not. The documentation is comprehensive and clear.vars_test.go (5)
11-21
: LGTM!The
TestVars_Names
function correctly verifies that theNames
function returns sorted variable names.
23-38
: LGTM!The
TestVars_Set
function correctly verifies that theSet
function sets environment variables and handles errors.
40-54
: LGTM!The
TestVars_Set_WhenSetenvFails
function correctly verifies that theSet
function returns an error whenosSetenv
fails.
56-66
: LGTM!The
TestVars_String
function correctly verifies that theString
function returns a sorted, comma-delimited string representation of the variables.
68-74
: LGTM!The
TestVars_String_WhenEmpty
function correctly verifies that theString
function returns "[]" when the map is empty.state.go (2)
13-40
: LGTM!The
State
function is correctly implemented to capture the current state of environment variables.
42-67
: LGTM!The
Reset
function is correctly implemented to reset the environment variables usingos.Clearenv
andos.Setenv
.parse_test.go (6)
12-24
: LGTM!The test case
TestParse
correctly verifies the functionality of theParse
function when the environment variable is set.
26-38
: LGTM!The test case
TestParse_WhenVariableNotSet
correctly verifies the functionality of theParse
function when the environment variable is not set.
40-53
: LGTM!The test case
TestParse_WhenConversionFails
correctly verifies the functionality of theParse
function when the conversion fails.
55-69
: LGTM!The test case
TestOverride
correctly verifies the functionality of theOverride
function when the environment variable is set and the value is different from the current value.
71-85
: LGTM!The test case
TestOverride_WhenValueIsNotChanged
correctly verifies the functionality of theOverride
function when the environment variable is set but the value is the same as the current value.
87-100
: LGTM!The test case
TestOverride_WhenVariableIsNotSet
correctly verifies the functionality of theOverride
function when the environment variable is not set.as/as_test.go (12)
14-24
: LGTM!The test case
TestDuration
correctly verifies the functionality of theDuration
function with a valid duration string.
26-36
: LGTM!The test case
TestDuration_WithSpecifiedUnit
correctly verifies the functionality of theDuration
function when a unit is specified.
38-48
: LGTM!The test case
TestDuration_DurationWithSpecifiedUnit
correctly verifies the functionality of theDuration
function when the duration string is invalid for the specified unit.
50-60
: LGTM!The test case
TestInt
correctly verifies the functionality of theInt
function with a valid integer string.
62-72
: LGTM!The test case
TestInt_WhenConversionFails
correctly verifies the functionality of theInt
function when the conversion fails.
74-84
: LGTM!The test case
TestPortNo
correctly verifies the functionality of thePortNo
function with a valid port number string.
86-96
: LGTM!The test case
TestPortNo_WhenConversionFails
correctly verifies the functionality of thePortNo
function when the conversion fails.
98-108
: LGTM!The test case
TestPortNo_WhenOutOfRange
correctly verifies the functionality of thePortNo
function when the port number is out of the valid range.
110-120
: LGTM!The test case
TestString
correctly verifies the functionality of theString
function with a valid string.
122-132
: LGTM!The test case
TestAbsoluteURL
correctly verifies the functionality of theAbsoluteURL
function with a valid URL string.
134-145
: LGTM!The test case
TestAbsoluteURL_WhenNotAValidURI
correctly verifies the functionality of theAbsoluteURL
function when the URL string is not a valid URI.
147-157
: LGTM!The test case
TestAbsoluteURL_WhenNotAnAbsoluteURL
correctly verifies the functionality of theAbsoluteURL
function when the URL string is not an absolute URL.parse.go (3)
3-16
: LGTM!The
ConversionFunc
type is well-documented and defines the intended function signature for converting a string to a value of typeT
.
18-61
: LGTM!The
Override
function is well-documented and correctly handles different scenarios for replacing the current value of a variable with the value obtained by parsing a named environment variable.
63-98
: LGTM!The
Parse
function is well-documented and correctly handles different scenarios for parsing the environment variable with the given name and returning a value of typeT
.README.md (3)
1-28
: LGTM!The "Banner and Project Description" section is well-structured and provides a clear overview of the project with relevant badges.
30-36
: LGTM!The "Features" section is well-structured and provides a clear overview of the project's key features.
37-41
: LGTM!The "Installation" section is well-structured and provides clear instructions for installing the project using
go get
.load.go (1)
11-51
: Documentation is comprehensive and clear.The comments provide a detailed explanation of the function's behavior, parameters, and return values. This is highly useful for understanding the function's purpose and usage.
env.go (5)
8-11
: LGTM!The function correctly clears all environment variables.
13-27
: LGTM!The function correctly retrieves the value of an environment variable.
75-92
: LGTM!The function correctly retrieves the value and existence of an environment variable.
95-108
: LGTM!The function correctly sets the value of an environment variable.
111-130
: LGTM!The function correctly removes the specified environment variables.
env_test.go (6)
11-22
: LGTM!The test correctly verifies that the
Clear
function removes all environment variables.
24-41
: LGTM!The test correctly verifies that the
Get
function retrieves the value of an environment variable.
43-84
: LGTM!The test correctly verifies that the
GetVars
function retrieves the correct environment variables.
87-106
: LGTM!The test correctly verifies that the
Lookup
function retrieves the value and existence of an environment variable.
108-119
: LGTM!The test correctly verifies that the
Set
function sets the value of an environment variable.
121-184
: LGTM!The test correctly verifies that the
Unset
function removes the specified environment variables.errors.go (8)
13-45
: LGTM!The
ParseError
type is well-defined and theError
method is implemented correctly.
47-61
: LGTM!The
Is
method is implemented correctly for theParseError
type.
63-66
: LGTM!The
Unwrap
method is implemented correctly for theParseError
type.
68-100
: LGTM!The
InvalidValueError
type is well-defined and theError
method is implemented correctly.
102-115
: LGTM!The
Is
method is implemented correctly for theInvalidValueError
type.
117-120
: LGTM!The
Unwrap
method is implemented correctly for theInvalidValueError
type.
122-144
: LGTM!The
RangeError
type is well-defined and theError
method is implemented correctly.
146-157
: LGTM!The
Is
method is implemented correctly for theRangeError
type.load_test.go (3)
1-1
: Ensure package naming consistency.The package name
env
should be consistent with the directory structure and the tested code.Ensure that the package name
env
matches the directory structure and the code being tested.
12-228
: Comprehensive test coverage forLoad
function.The test cases cover various scenarios, including different file paths and file existence checks. This ensures robust validation of the
Load
function.
230-244
: Comprehensive test coverage forloadFile
function.The test case covers scenarios with empty lines and comments in the file, ensuring the
loadFile
function handles these cases correctly.errors_test.go (10)
1-1
: Ensure package naming consistency.The package name
env
should be consistent with the directory structure and the tested code.Ensure that the package name
env
matches the directory structure and the code being tested.
10-57
: Comprehensive test coverage forParseError.Error
method.The test cases cover various scenarios, ensuring the
Error
method ofParseError
handles different conditions correctly.
60-111
: Comprehensive test coverage forParseError.Is
method.The test cases cover various scenarios, ensuring the
Is
method ofParseError
handles different conditions correctly.
113-125
: Comprehensive test coverage forParseError.Unwrap
method.The test case ensures the
Unwrap
method ofParseError
correctly returns the underlying error.
127-174
: Comprehensive test coverage forInvalidValueError.Error
method.The test cases cover various scenarios, ensuring the
Error
method ofInvalidValueError
handles different conditions correctly.
177-227
: Comprehensive test coverage forInvalidValueError.Is
method.The test cases cover various scenarios, ensuring the
Is
method ofInvalidValueError
handles different conditions correctly.
230-242
: Comprehensive test coverage forInvalidValueError.Unwrap
method.The test case ensures the
Unwrap
method ofInvalidValueError
correctly returns the underlying error.
244-279
: Comprehensive test coverage forRangeError.Error
method.The test cases cover various scenarios, ensuring the
Error
method ofRangeError
handles different conditions correctly.
282-331
: Comprehensive test coverage forRangeError.Is
method.The test cases cover various scenarios, ensuring the
Is
method ofRangeError
handles different conditions correctly.
3-8
: Check for unused imports.Verify if all imported packages are utilized within the tests. Unused imports should be removed to keep the code clean.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- env.go (1 hunks)
- env_test.go (1 hunks)
- errors.go (1 hunks)
- errors_test.go (1 hunks)
- funcs.go (1 hunks)
- load.go (1 hunks)
- load_test.go (1 hunks)
- parse.go (1 hunks)
- parse_test.go (1 hunks)
- state.go (1 hunks)
- state_test.go (1 hunks)
- vars.go (1 hunks)
- vars_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
- env.go
- env_test.go
- errors.go
- errors_test.go
- funcs.go
- load.go
- state.go
- state_test.go
- vars.go
- vars_test.go
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
load_test.go (1)
Learnt from: deltics PR: blugnu/env#2 File: load_test.go:3-10 Timestamp: 2024-07-04T08:06:24.732Z Learning: The `io/fs` package is used in the `load_test.go` file, specifically `fs.ErrNotExist`.
Additional comments not posted (10)
parse_test.go (6)
12-24
: LGTM!The
TestParse
function is well-structured and correctly tests theParse
function for a valid environment variable.
26-38
: LGTM!The
TestParse_WhenVariableNotSet
function is well-structured and correctly tests theParse
function for an unset environment variable.
40-53
: LGTM!The
TestParse_WhenConversionFails
function is well-structured and correctly tests theParse
function when the conversion fails.
55-69
: LGTM!The
TestOverride
function is well-structured and correctly tests theOverride
function for a valid environment variable.
71-85
: LGTM!The
TestOverride_WhenValueIsNotChanged
function is well-structured and correctly tests theOverride
function when the value is not changed.
87-100
: LGTM!The
TestOverride_WhenVariableIsNotSet
function is well-structured and correctly tests theOverride
function for an unset environment variable.parse.go (2)
18-61
: LGTM!The
Override
function is well-implemented, with proper error handling and logic to replace the variable's value.
63-97
: LGTM!The
Parse
function is well-implemented, with proper error handling and logic to parse and convert the environment variable's value.load_test.go (2)
12-228
: LGTM!The
TestLoad
function is comprehensive and well-structured, covering various scenarios for theLoad
function.
230-244
: LGTM!The
TestLoadFile_WithEmptyLinesAndComments
function is well-structured and correctly tests theloadFile
function for handling empty lines and comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- env.go (1 hunks)
- env_test.go (1 hunks)
- errors.go (1 hunks)
- errors_test.go (1 hunks)
- funcs.go (1 hunks)
- load.go (1 hunks)
- load_test.go (1 hunks)
- parse.go (1 hunks)
- parse_test.go (1 hunks)
- state.go (1 hunks)
- state_test.go (1 hunks)
- vars.go (1 hunks)
- vars_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (13)
- env.go
- env_test.go
- errors.go
- errors_test.go
- funcs.go
- load.go
- load_test.go
- parse.go
- parse_test.go
- state.go
- state_test.go
- vars.go
- vars_test.go
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Tests
Chores
.gitignore
to exclude IDE settings.