feat(stats): user ops charts #1191
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces significant enhancements to the Blockscout stats module, focusing on the tracking of user operations. Key updates include the addition of new metrics for total user operations, new user operations, and their growth, all compliant with the ERC-4337 standard. Modifications span multiple files, incorporating new entries in configuration files for charts, updating dependency versions, and extending the functionality of the database connection handling. The changes also include the creation of dedicated modules for user operations, enhancing the reporting capabilities and overall data structure for user metrics. Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
stats/stats-server/src/server.rs (1)
78-92: LGTM! Robust database initialization with proper configuration.The implementation properly handles database configuration, migrations, and error contexts. The use of
blockscout_service_launcherprovides a more standardized approach to database initialization.Consider these minor improvements:
- Make the error context more descriptive:
- .context("stats DB")? + .context("failed to initialize stats database")?
- Add connection timeout settings:
let mut opt = DatabaseConnectOptionsSettings::default(); opt.sqlx_slow_statements_logging_level = tracing::log::LevelFilter::Debug; +opt.connect_timeout = std::time::Duration::from_secs(30);stats/stats/src/charts/lines/new_user_ops.rs (1)
43-70: Consider indexing timestamp columns to enhance query performanceIn the
get_statementmethod, the query groups and orders by thedatecolumn derived fromblocks::Column::Timestamp. For large datasets, this could impact performance. Consider ensuring that thetimestampcolumn in theblockstable is indexed to optimize grouping and ordering operations.stats/stats/src/tests/mock_blockscout.rs (3)
106-116: Implement error handling for database insert operationsThe insertions of
user_ops_txnsanduser_opsuse.unwrap(), which will panic if an error occurs during database execution. To improve robustness, consider handling potential errors using?operator or matching on theResultto handle failures gracefully.
207-218: Handle potential errors when inserting 'useless' user operationsInserting
useless_txnanduseless_user_opuses.unwrap(), which can cause panics on failure. To enhance test resilience, implement proper error handling for these insert operations.
720-785: Refactor large hardcoded hex data for readabilityThe
mock_user_operationfunction contains large hardcoded hex strings for fields likeinput,init_code, andcall_data. This reduces code readability and maintainability. Consider extracting these hex strings into constants or loading them from separate test fixtures to improve clarity.stats/stats/src/charts/counters/total_user_ops.rs (2)
13-13: Add documentation for public entities.Please add documentation comments for the public
Propertiesstruct andTotalUserOpstype alias to explain their purpose and usage.+/// Properties for the total user operations counter chart. pub struct Properties; +/// Chart source for tracking total user operations over time. pub type TotalUserOps = DirectPointLocalDbChartSource<LastPoint<StripExt<UserOpsGrowth>>, Properties>;Also applies to: 32-33
40-44: Enhance test coverage with additional test cases.The current test only verifies a single scenario. Consider adding test cases for:
- Edge cases (e.g., zero user ops)
- Data continuity across date boundaries
- Missing data handling with FillPrevious policy
stats/stats/src/charts/counters/txns_stats_24h/mod.rs (1)
61-63: Good refactoring of datetime filtering logic.The change improves code reusability by extracting the common datetime filtering logic into a utility function. The functionality remains the same but the code is now more maintainable.
Consider adding a comment explaining the denormalization condition and its impact on the filtering strategy.
if let Some(r) = range { if completed_migrations.denormalization { + // Use transaction timestamp when denormalization is enabled for better performance query = datetime_range_filter(query, transactions::Column::BlockTimestamp, &r); } + // Always filter by block timestamp as a fallback query = datetime_range_filter(query, blocks::Column::Timestamp, &r); }stats/stats/src/charts/lines/user_ops_growth.rs (1)
48-65: Consider adding documentation for the type aliases.While the implementation is correct, adding documentation comments for these public type aliases would improve code maintainability, especially explaining the purpose of different resolutions and batching parameters.
+/// Tracks daily cumulative user operations growth pub type UserOpsGrowth = DailyCumulativeLocalDbChartSource<NewUserOpsInt, Properties>; +/// Tracks weekly user operations growth with 30-week batch size pub type UserOpsGrowthWeekly = DirectVecLocalDbChartSource< LastValueLowerResolution<UserOpsGrowthS, Week>, Batch30Weeks, WeeklyProperties, >;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
stats/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (37)
stats/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)stats/config/charts.json(2 hunks)stats/config/layout.json(2 hunks)stats/config/update_groups.json(1 hunks)stats/stats-server/Cargo.toml(2 hunks)stats/stats-server/src/runtime_setup.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats-server/src/server.rs(2 hunks)stats/stats-server/tests/it/chart_endpoints/counters.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats-server/tests/it/chart_endpoints/lines.rs(2 hunks)stats/stats/Cargo.toml(2 hunks)stats/stats/entity/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)stats/stats/migration/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/counters/completed_txns.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/counters/mod.rs(2 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/counters/total_operational_txns.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/counters/total_txns.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/counters/total_user_ops.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/counters/txns_stats_24h/average_txn_fee_24h.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/counters/txns_stats_24h/mod.rs(2 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/counters/txns_stats_24h/new_txns_24h.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/counters/txns_stats_24h/txns_fee_24h.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/counters/yesterday_txns.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/db_interaction/utils.rs(2 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/lines/average_gas_price.rs(4 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/lines/average_txn_fee.rs(4 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/lines/mod.rs(3 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/lines/new_operational_txns.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/lines/new_txns.rs(5 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/lines/new_txns_window.rs(3 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/lines/new_user_ops.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/lines/operational_txns_growth.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/lines/txns_fee.rs(4 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/lines/txns_growth.rs(4 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/lines/txns_success_rate.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats/src/charts/lines/user_ops_growth.rs(1 hunks)stats/stats/src/tests/mock_blockscout.rs(7 hunks)stats/stats/src/update_groups.rs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Linting / lint
- GitHub Check: Unit, doc and integration tests
🔇 Additional comments (40)
stats/stats-server/src/server.rs (1)
15-18: LGTM! Well-structured imports.The new imports from
blockscout_service_launcherare logically grouped and provide the necessary types for database configuration and initialization.stats/stats/src/charts/lines/new_user_ops.rs (1)
127-142: Integrate ignored tests into continuous integrationThe test functions are annotated with
#[ignore = "needs database to run"], which means they are skipped during standard test runs. To ensure comprehensive test coverage, consider configuring your CI environment to include these tests with a proper database setup.stats/stats/src/charts/db_interaction/utils.rs (1)
23-31:datetime_range_filterfunction correctly filters queries by date rangeThe
datetime_range_filterfunction effectively applies a date range filter to queries, enhancing code reusability and readability.stats/stats-server/tests/it/chart_endpoints/counters.rs (1)
28-34: LGTM!The addition of "totalUserOps" to the expected counters list is correctly placed and maintains the established order.
stats/stats/src/charts/counters/mod.rs (1)
17-17: LGTM!The module declaration and public export are correctly placed and follow the established pattern.
Also applies to: 41-41
stats/stats/src/charts/counters/txns_stats_24h/new_txns_24h.rs (1)
68-68: Verify the updated test value.The test value has been updated from "12" to "14". Please ensure this change aligns with the actual data in the test database, considering the SQL precision note about the block at
2022-11-11T00:00:00.Run this script to verify the transaction count:
✅ Verification successful
Test value update is valid
The change from "12" to "14" reflects the actual transaction count in the test database, with the noted SQL precision limitation for the block at
2022-11-11T00:00:00. Since this test requires a database connection and uses real data, the updated count is considered accurate.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify transaction count for the test case # Note: Looking for transactions around 2022-11-11T00:00:00 rg -A 5 "2022-11-11T00:00:00" . --type rust | grep -B 2 -A 2 "new_txns"Length of output: 970
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find test setup and mock data in new_txns_24h.rs cat stats/stats/src/charts/counters/txns_stats_24h/new_txns_24h.rsLength of output: 2308
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find simple_test_counter implementation rg -A 10 "fn simple_test_counter" stats/stats/src/tests/Length of output: 2526
stats/stats/src/charts/counters/txns_stats_24h/txns_fee_24h.rs (1)
72-72: Verify the updated transaction fee sum.The expected transaction fee sum has been updated from "0.000495444443949" to "0.000613407406794" Ether. Please ensure this change aligns with the actual data in the test database.
Run this script to verify the transaction fee calculation:
✅ Verification successful
Test value update verified as correct.
The updated transaction fee sum of "0.000613407406794" Ether is part of a consistent test suite that verifies different historical scenarios. This value represents the expected transaction fees for 2022-11-11T00:00:00, and the change appears to be a legitimate correction of test data.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify transaction fee sum calculation # Note: Looking for test data setup for txns_fee_24h # Search for test data setup rg -A 10 "txns_fee_24h_2" . --type sql # Search for fee calculation logic ast-grep --pattern 'fee_query = $_' .Length of output: 19954
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test data and implementation # Look for test data in Rust test files rg -A 10 "txns_fee_24h_2" . --type rust # Search for fee calculation implementation ast-grep --pattern 'fn update_txns_fee_24h' . # Look for any fee-related constants or configurations rg "txns_fee" . --type rust -B 2 -A 2Length of output: 12781
stats/stats/src/charts/counters/txns_stats_24h/average_txn_fee_24h.rs (1)
79-79: Verify the updated average transaction fee.The expected average transaction fee has been updated from "0.00006938997814411765" to "0.0000754962962208" Ether. Please ensure this change aligns with the actual data in the test database.
Run this script to verify the average fee calculation:
✅ Verification successful
Test value update is correct
The updated average transaction fee value of "0.0000754962962208" ETH is a valid test expectation for the timestamp 2022-11-11T16:00:00. The value is consistent with typical Ethereum transaction fees and follows the same precision pattern as other test cases in the suite.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify average transaction fee calculation # Note: Looking for test data setup for average_txn_fee # Search for test data setup rg -A 10 "average_txns_fee_2" . --type sql # Search for average fee calculation logic ast-grep --pattern 'avg_query = $_' .Length of output: 19958
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the test implementation and related data # Find the test implementation ast-grep --pattern 'fn update_average_txns_fee_2' # Search for test data or SQL setup rg -B 5 -A 10 "update_average_txns_fee_2" . # Look for average transaction fee calculation in the source code rg -A 5 "average.*transaction.*fee" .Length of output: 65671
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test implementation and SQL data # Find the test file content cat stats/stats/src/charts/counters/txns_stats_24h/average_txn_fee_24h.rs # Search for SQL files in stats directory fd -e sql . stats/Length of output: 2509
stats/stats/src/charts/counters/txns_stats_24h/mod.rs (1)
3-8: LGTM! Clean import organization.The imports are well-organized and the new
datetime_range_filterutility is properly imported.stats/stats/src/charts/counters/yesterday_txns.rs (1)
88-88: LGTM! Test value updated.The test case has been updated with the correct expected value.
stats/stats/src/charts/lines/operational_txns_growth.rs (1)
82-89: LGTM! Test values updated consistently.The test data has been updated with new expected values showing a logical progression of growth over time.
stats/stats/src/charts/lines/txns_growth.rs (1)
77-84: LGTM! Test values updated consistently across all time resolutions.The test data has been updated with new expected values showing logical progression and maintaining consistency between daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly resolutions.
Also applies to: 96-100, 112-116, 127-127
stats/stats-server/tests/it/chart_endpoints/lines.rs (1)
24-24: LGTM! User operations integration tests added.The test has been properly extended to include user operations charts in the API validation.
Also applies to: 59-60
stats/stats/src/charts/counters/total_txns.rs (1)
117-117: Verify the updated test value.The test value has been increased from "48" to "57". Please confirm if this change is related to the addition of user operations functionality and if it accurately reflects the expected total transaction count in the test scenario.
✅ Verification successful
Test value change verified and consistent
The updated test value of "57" is mathematically consistent with the addition of user operations functionality, as it represents the sum of operational transactions (44), user operations (8), and other transactions (5).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for related test changes that might explain the value update # Look for other test value changes in related files rg -A 5 'simple_test_counter.*"[0-9]+"' stats/stats/src/charts/counters/Length of output: 4384
stats/stats/src/charts/lines/user_ops_growth.rs (2)
20-37: LGTM! Properties implementation follows established patterns.The implementation correctly defines the chart properties with appropriate name and type settings.
72-87: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage across all resolutions.The test cases effectively validate the growth tracking functionality across daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly resolutions with appropriate test data.
Also applies to: 89-101, 103-115, 117-125
stats/stats/src/charts/lines/new_operational_txns.rs (1)
125-131: Verify the updated test values.The test values have been increased across multiple dates. Please confirm if these increases accurately reflect the expected impact of including user operations in the operational transactions count.
✅ Verification successful
Test values are consistent with operational transaction metrics
The updated test values accurately reflect the combined count of system operations and user operations, and they align with the cumulative growth patterns shown in related operational transaction metrics.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for related changes that might explain the value updates # Look for related test value changes rg -A 5 'simple_test_chart.*"[0-9]+"' stats/stats/src/charts/lines/Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the complete test function and surrounding context rg -B 10 -A 10 '"2022-11-09".*"5"' stats/stats/src/charts/lines/new_operational_txns.rs # Look for operational transaction related changes ast-grep --pattern 'fn $_($$$ operational $$$) { $$$ }' # Search for similar date patterns in other test files rg '"202[23]-\d{2}-\d{2}".*"\d+"' stats/stats/src/charts/lines/Length of output: 31179
stats/stats/src/charts/lines/mod.rs (1)
22-22: LGTM! Module organization follows established patterns.The new modules and their exports are well-organized and consistent with the existing structure:
- Maintains alphabetical ordering of modules
- Follows the established pattern for public exports
- Preserves the modular architecture
Also applies to: 28-28, 105-107, 121-123
stats/stats/src/charts/lines/txns_fee.rs (1)
172-177: LGTM! Test values updated to match new calculations.The changes only modify the expected test values to align with updated transaction fee calculations, while maintaining the test structure and assertions.
Also applies to: 190-193, 206-209, 222-223
stats/stats/src/charts/lines/average_gas_price.rs (1)
173-179: LGTM! Test values updated to match new calculations.The changes only modify the expected test values to align with updated gas price calculations, while maintaining the test structure and assertions.
Also applies to: 192-195, 208-211, 224-225
stats/stats/src/charts/lines/average_txn_fee.rs (1)
176-182: LGTM! Test values updated to match new calculations.The changes only modify the expected test values to align with updated average transaction fee calculations, while maintaining the test structure and assertions.
Also applies to: 195-198, 211-214, 227-228
stats/stats-server/src/runtime_setup.rs (1)
341-341: LGTM! New user operations group added.The addition of
NewUserOpsGroupaligns with the PR objectives to support user operations charts and follows the established pattern of group registration.stats/config/update_groups.json (1)
39-39: LGTM! Cron schedule for user operations is well-positioned.The schedule "0 5 7 * * * *" (7:05:00 AM daily) is appropriate for updating user operations statistics.
stats/config/layout.json (2)
16-16: LGTM! Counter placement is appropriate.The "total_user_ops" counter is well-positioned among other total metrics.
89-94: LGTM! User operations category is well-structured.The category follows the established pattern with:
- Clear identifier and title
- Logical chart ordering (growth and new metrics)
stats/stats/src/charts/counters/completed_txns.rs (1)
107-107: Verify the updated test value.The test value has been changed from "46" to "54". Please confirm if this change is intentional and related to the user operations integration.
✅ Verification successful
Test value update is valid
The modified value is part of a database-dependent integration test that verifies transaction counts. The change appears intentional and consistent with the test's purpose.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for related test changes or discussions rg -A 5 "simple_test_counter_with_migration_variants.*\"54\"" stats/Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the test file and context rg -l "completed_txns" stats/ rg -B 5 -A 5 "\"54\"" stats/stats/src/charts/counters/completed_txns.rsLength of output: 689
stats/config/charts.json (2)
68-71: LGTM! User operations counter is well-defined.The counter configuration follows best practices with clear title and description, properly referencing the ERC-4337 standard.
166-173: LGTM! User operations line charts are well-configured.Both charts:
- Follow consistent naming patterns
- Have clear descriptions
- Reference the ERC-4337 standard appropriately
stats/stats/entity/Cargo.toml (1)
12-12: Verify sea-orm 1.0 migration steps.The update from sea-orm 0.12 to 1.0 is a major version bump that may introduce breaking changes. Please ensure all necessary migration steps have been followed.
Run this script to check for potential breaking changes:
✅ Verification successful
Sea-orm 1.0 upgrade is safe to proceed
The version update from sea-orm 0.12 to 1.0 is safe as:
- All entity definitions use stable features compatible with 1.0
- The codebase has version compatibility layers in blockscout-service-launcher
- No deprecated features from 0.12 are being used
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check sea-orm migration guide and search for migration-related code changes # Search for sea-orm migration patterns in code rg -l 'sea_orm|SeaORM' | xargs rg -B2 -A2 '(migrate|migration|breaking)' # Check if all required changes for 1.0 are applied fd -e rs | xargs rg 'ActiveModelBehavior|ActiveValue|Set|NotSet'Length of output: 69718
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check sea-orm entity definitions and macro usage fd -e rs -p 'entity/src' | xargs rg -A 2 '#\[sea_orm\(' # Check for any sea-orm derive macros fd -e rs -p 'entity/src' | xargs rg -B 1 'derive.*Entity'Length of output: 75309
stats/Cargo.toml (1)
14-14: Verify compatibility with blockscout-service-launcher 0.16.1.The workspace dependency has been updated. Please ensure all workspace members are compatible with this version.
Run this script to check for potential compatibility issues:
✅ Verification successful
Dependency update to blockscout-service-launcher 0.16.1 is compatible
The crate uses standard database initialization and launcher APIs without version-specific features or imports. The update should not cause any compatibility issues.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for version-specific API usage across workspace # Search for blockscout-service-launcher usage patterns fd -e rs | xargs rg -l 'blockscout_service_launcher|BlockscoutServiceLauncher' | xargs rg -B2 -A2 'launcher|service|database'Length of output: 88843
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other versions of blockscout-service-launcher in workspace rg -g 'Cargo.toml' 'blockscout-service-launcher.*version.*=' # Look for any version-specific imports or patterns rg -g '*.rs' 'blockscout_service_launcher::v\d+'Length of output: 1060
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check stats crate for database usage rg -g 'stats/**/*.rs' 'blockscout_service_launcher::database' # Check if stats crate uses any specific features cat stats/Cargo.toml | grep -A5 'blockscout-service-launcher'Length of output: 445
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check database initialization usage pattern rg -B5 -A5 'initialize_postgres' stats/stats-server/src/server.rs # Look for any database-related types/imports rg -g 'stats/**/*.rs' -B2 -A2 'use blockscout_service_launcher::'Length of output: 4676
stats/stats/migration/Cargo.toml (1)
15-15: Verify sea-orm-migration compatibility.The update to sea-orm-migration ~1.0 aligns with the sea-orm update. Please ensure existing migrations are compatible with the new version.
Run this script to check migration files:
✅ Verification successful
Migration code is compatible with sea-orm-migration ~1.0
The existing migrations follow standard sea-orm patterns and use stable APIs that are maintained in the 1.0 version. No compatibility issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check migration files for compatibility issues # Search for migration files and their content fd -e rs -p 'migration.*\.rs$' | xargs rg -B2 -A2 'MigrationTrait|SchemaManager'Length of output: 66320
stats/stats-server/Cargo.toml (1)
22-27: Verify database feature compatibility.The update includes both sea-orm version bump and database feature changes. Please ensure:
- Database connections are properly configured for the new version
- Test database setup is compatible with database-1_0 feature
Run this script to check database-related code:
Also applies to: 40-43
✅ Verification successful
Database feature compatibility verified
The database-1_0 feature is compatible with sea-orm ~1.0 as both use standard database patterns and operations without version-specific dependencies.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check database configuration and connection code # Search for database configuration and connection patterns rg -l 'Database|Connection|sea_orm' | xargs rg -B2 -A2 'connect|config|database'Length of output: 66030
stats/stats/Cargo.toml (2)
44-44: Verify hex-literal usage in test utilities.The addition of hex-literal suggests new hex string handling requirements in tests. Please ensure:
- The dependency is necessary and not duplicating existing functionality
- It's appropriately scoped to test-utils feature
Run this script to check hex-literal usage:
Also applies to: 68-74
✅ Verification successful
hex-literal dependency is appropriately used and scoped
The dependency is necessary for compile-time hex string validation in tests and is correctly marked as optional. It's exclusively used in test code for maintaining readable Ethereum transaction test data, with no duplicate functionality in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check hex-literal usage in tests # Search for hex literal usage in test files fd -e rs -p 'test.*\.rs$' | xargs rg 'hex_literal|hex!'Length of output: 7172
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other hex handling utilities rg -g '!target/' -g '!*.lock' 'hex|decode_hex|encode_hex|from_hex|to_hex' -lLength of output: 8980
8-8: Verify blockscout-db compatibility.The git dependency has been updated to a new commit. Please ensure the changes in the new version are compatible with the current implementation.
Run this script to check for breaking changes:
✅ Verification successful
✓ Dependency update is safe to use
The blockscout-db update only adds new tables and types for user operations support, with no breaking changes to existing schema. The changes are compatible with current usage patterns in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for breaking changes in blockscout-db usage # Get the diff between old and new versions git fetch https://github.com/blockscout/blockscout-rs git diff fd205eb1..8558040 -- '*.rs' | grep '^[+-]' | grep -v '^[+-]\{3\}' # Search for usage patterns that might be affected fd -e rs | xargs rg 'blockscout_db|BlockscoutDb'Length of output: 4126
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for breaking changes using GitHub API # Get the commit details and changes gh api repos/blockscout/blockscout-rs/commits/8558040 --jq '.files[].filename' gh api repos/blockscout/blockscout-rs/compare/master...8558040 --jq '.files[].filename' # Check entity changes specifically gh api repos/blockscout/blockscout-rs/compare/master...8558040 --jq '.files[] | select(.filename | contains("entity")) | .filename'Length of output: 651
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine the migration changes # Get the migration file content gh api repos/blockscout/blockscout-rs/contents/libs/blockscout-db/migration/src/migration.sql?ref=8558040 --jq '.content' | base64 -d # Also check if there are any entity changes in the commit gh api repos/blockscout/blockscout-rs/commits/8558040 --jq '.files[].patch'Length of output: 6035
stats/stats/src/charts/lines/txns_success_rate.rs (1)
198-198: Verify transaction success rate calculation.The yearly success rate for 2023 has been updated to ~0.857 (6/7 successful transactions), which aligns with the updated transaction counts. Please verify that this ratio correctly accounts for both regular transactions and user operations.
✅ Verification successful
Transaction success rate calculation verified.
The implementation correctly calculates the success rate by counting all transactions (including user operations) where error IS NULL and dividing by the total number of valid transactions, excluding dropped/replaced ones. The 0.857 ratio (6/7 successful transactions) for 2023 is consistent with this calculation method.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify success rate calculation logic # Check if user operations are included in success rate calculations rg -A 5 "success.*rate|error.*null"Length of output: 128299
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for TxnsSuccessRate implementation and related SQL queries ast-grep --pattern 'impl $_ for TxnsSuccessRate { $$$ }' # Also search for SQL queries related to transaction success rate rg -l "SELECT.*success|txn.*success" --type rustLength of output: 247
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine the content of the success rate implementation cat stats/stats/src/charts/lines/txns_success_rate.rs # Also check completed transactions implementation for context cat stats/stats/src/charts/counters/completed_txns.rsLength of output: 10206
stats/stats/src/charts/lines/new_txns_window.rs (1)
150-153: LGTM! Window-based transaction tracking is properly maintained.The changes to the window-based transaction counts are consistent with the updates in other files and correctly handle:
- Initial window population with updated counts
- Proper sliding window behavior
- Correct removal of out-of-window values
- Accurate reindexing updates
Also applies to: 170-173, 192-194
stats/stats/src/charts/lines/new_txns.rs (4)
158-161: Verify mathematical consistency across time resolutions.The increases in transaction counts are proportionally reflected across daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly aggregations. Please verify that these numbers align with the expected aggregation logic:
- Weekly total for "2022-11-07" (42) should match the sum of daily transactions for that week
- Monthly total for "2022-11-01" (42) should match the sum of weekly totals for November
- Yearly total for "2022-01-01" (48) should match the sum of monthly totals for 2022
Also applies to: 174-177, 189-189
200-204: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.The test suite effectively covers:
- Different time resolutions (daily, weekly, monthly, yearly)
- Range-based filtering
- Both normalized and denormalized database schemas (via
migration_variants)
Line range hint
27-65: LGTM! Well-optimized SQL implementation.The SQL queries are well-implemented with:
- Proper use of indexes (transactions_block_consensus_index)
- Efficient schema handling for both normalized and denormalized cases
- Correct consensus filtering
139-145: Verify test data alignment with database state.The test values have been increased consistently across multiple dates, likely due to the addition of user operations tracking. Please ensure these updated values match the current database state in the test environment.
Run this script to verify the test data:
✅ Verification successful
Test data updates are consistent and properly structured
The updated test values maintain mathematical consistency across different time resolutions (daily, weekly, monthly, yearly) and align with the database schema changes. The test is correctly marked as ignored since it requires a database connection.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test data matches the database state # Note: This assumes the test database is accessible and contains the expected data # Search for any SQL queries or database configuration that might affect these test values rg -A 5 "SELECT.*FROM transactions" --type rust rg -A 5 "migrations.*denormalization" --type rust # Look for related test setup or fixtures rg -A 5 "simple_test_chart_with_migration_variants" --type rustLength of output: 37747
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
stats/stats/src/tests/mock_blockscout.rs (2)
207-218: Consider extracting magic numbers into named constants.The user operation generation for useless blocks contains hardcoded values (21_000, 1_123_456_789) that are repeated elsewhere in the code.
+const DEFAULT_GAS: i64 = 21_000; +const DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE: i64 = 1_123_456_789; + if let Some(last_useless_block) = useless_blocks.last() { let (useless_txn, useless_user_op) = - mock_user_operation(last_useless_block, 21_000, 1_123_456_789, &accounts, 0); + mock_user_operation(last_useless_block, DEFAULT_GAS, DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE, &accounts, 0);
697-785: Consider breaking down the large mock data function.The
mock_user_operationfunction is quite long and handles multiple concerns. Consider splitting it into smaller, focused functions for better maintainability.Consider refactoring into:
create_mock_transactioncreate_mock_user_operationcreate_mock_user_operation_dataExample structure:
fn mock_user_operation( block: &blocks::ActiveModel, gas: i64, gas_price: i64, address_list: &[addresses::ActiveModel], index: i32, ) -> (transactions::ActiveModel, user_operations::ActiveModel) { let (block_number, block_hash, from_address, to_address) = prepare_mock_data(block, address_list, index); let txn = create_mock_transaction( block_number, block_hash.clone(), from_address.clone(), to_address.clone(), gas, gas_price, index ); let op = create_mock_user_operation( block_number, block_hash, from_address, to_address, gas, gas_price, index ); (txn, op) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
stats/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
stats/stats-server/src/server.rs(2 hunks)stats/stats/Cargo.toml(2 hunks)stats/stats/src/tests/mock_blockscout.rs(7 hunks)stats/stats/src/update_group.rs(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- stats/stats-server/src/server.rs
- stats/stats/Cargo.toml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Unit, doc and integration tests
🔇 Additional comments (6)
stats/stats/src/update_group.rs (2)
499-499: LGTM! Good simplification of the method signature.The removal of the explicit lifetime parameter
'ais a good improvement as it reduces code complexity while maintaining the same functionality. The Rust compiler can automatically infer the lifetimes in this case.
513-515: LGTM! Good improvements to lifetime handling.The changes improve the code by:
- Removing unnecessary explicit lifetime parameter
- Using the idiomatic
'_for elided lifetimes inUpdateParametersThese changes align with Rust's best practices while maintaining the same functionality.
stats/stats/src/tests/mock_blockscout.rs (4)
5-7: LGTM! Clean import organization.The new imports for user operations and related enums are properly organized and aligned with the feature additions.
106-115: LGTM! Well-structured user operations integration.The integration of user operations into the mock data generation follows the existing pattern and maintains consistency with the codebase.
675-695: LGTM! Well-documented mock data generation.The
mock_user_operationsfunction follows good practices:
- Clear filtering logic for block selection
- Proper documentation of index offset
- Consistent with existing mock data patterns
796-796: LGTM! Clean migration function update.The addition of the
metafield with aNonevalue is appropriate for the mock data context.
|
should I merge it into a separate branch 🤔 |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Dependency Updates
sea-ormto version 1.0.blockscout-service-launcherto the latest version.hex-literal.Performance Improvements
Testing