feat(verification-common): implement transformation functions #1157
Conversation
…on and runtime code
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant enhancements to the verification-common library, focusing on improving code artifact type handling and verification processes. A new module These changes modify several key files in the The implementation enhances type safety by replacing generic Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/verification_match.rs (4)
12-12: Consider grouping imports.
Depending on your internal style guidelines, grouping related imports may help readability. However, if you have no specific guideline for that, this can stay as-is.
120-149: Check CBOR auxdata transformations for concurrency-safety & potential edge cases.
The transformations iterate over all CBOR elements. If future concurrency is considered, ensure safe usage if objects can be mutated in parallel. Currently, it appears correct for single-thread usage.
154-191: Validate offset uniqueness & consistency.
The code ensures all library offsets match. This is good for ensuring correctness. Consider logging specific mismatch details if this occurs in production.
196-230: Provide extended clarifications in error messages.
When raising an error about inconsistent immutable references, it could be beneficial to include the expected vs. actual values for debugging.libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/creation_code_artifacts.rs (1)
33-34: Consider documenting field types and their expected formatsWhile the type-level changes improve safety, adding documentation about the expected structure of
LinkReferencesandCborAuxdatawould help users understand the data format requirements.libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/verification_match_values.rs (1)
41-53: Consider adding validation for input valuesWhile the API improvements are good, consider adding validation for the input values before conversion, especially for constructor arguments and immutables which might have specific format requirements.
Example validation:
pub fn add_constructor_arguments(&mut self, value: impl Into<Bytes>) -> &mut Self { let bytes = value.into(); // Add validation here // if !is_valid_constructor_args(&bytes) { // panic!("Invalid constructor arguments format"); // } self.constructor_arguments = Some(bytes); self }libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/runtime_code_artifacts.rs (1)
38-41: Consider adding field documentationWhile the type changes improve safety, adding documentation for these fields would help users understand:
- The structure and purpose of each artifact type
- When each field is expected to be present/absent
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/code_artifact_types.rs(1 hunks)libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/creation_code_artifacts.rs(3 hunks)libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/mod.rs(1 hunks)libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/runtime_code_artifacts.rs(3 hunks)libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/verification_match.rs(3 hunks)libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/verification_match_values.rs(1 hunks)libs/verification-common/tests/integration/main.rs(1 hunks)libs/verification-common/tests/integration/verifier_alliance_matches.rs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- libs/verification-common/tests/integration/main.rs
🔇 Additional comments (25)
libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/verification_match.rs (3)
2-3: Validate re-exports & usage.
These imports look correct and consistent with the transformations data structures.
23-36: Ensure robust error handling for creation code verification.
The function returns an Option only upon successful code matching and transformations. Confirm that external callers properly handle the None case (failed match) to avoid silent failures.
38-50: Runtime code verification logic looks solid.
The structure parallels the creation code verification. Good separation of concerns.
libs/verification-common/tests/integration/verifier_alliance_matches.rs (11)
1-14: Test helpers are well-structured.
Functions parse_code and parse_artifacts are straightforward and help DRY the test code.
15-33: verify_creation_code test helper
This function helps reduce boilerplate in actual test cases. The .expect(...) calls are appropriate for test code.
34-49: verify_runtime_code test helper
Mirrors the creation code approach. This consistent approach helps maintain code parity across tests.
50-131: Test "full_match" correctness.
The test adequately verifies no transformations occur and that metadata_match = true for both creation & runtime code. Good coverage for a "perfect match" scenario.
133-214: Test "partial_match" correctness.
The test ensures that if on-chain code differs, a transformation is recorded. Good negative vs. positive path coverage.
217-297: Tests for multiple CBOR parts
The “partial_match_with_double_auxdata_parts” scenario ensures multi-segment offsets are handled. Great approach for checking corner cases.
300-380: Test "immutables"
Verifies immutables transformation. Good coverage of the constructor vs. runtime usage.
382-463: Test "manually_linked_libraries"
Ensures library placeholders are properly recognized and replaced. The final transformation check is correct.
466-546: Test "constructor_arguments"
Checks that the constructor arguments transformation is recognized and stored. Having a positive test case for non-empty constructor arguments is essential.
549-563: Test "invalid_constructor_arguments"
Validates the scenario where the contract code has fewer arguments than the provided ABI. The function should return None, which it does.
565-580: Test "non_existent_constructor_argument"
Checks that providing constructor arguments when none exist in the ABI returns None. The test is correct and ensures robust coverage.
libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/mod.rs (3)
1-1: Module declarations
All modules have been grouped well for clarity.
9-11: Readable type exports
Re-exporting specialized data structures (CborAuxdata, etc.) fosters easier usage in external modules.
15-18: Public re-exports of verify_ functions*
Exposing verify_creation_code and verify_runtime_code is consistent with the library’s intended usage. Good addition.
libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/code_artifact_types.rs (3)
1-2: Appropriate imports
Using BTreeMap plus serde for (de)serialization suits these structures well, especially for stable iteration and ordering.
4-10: CBOR Auxdata structure
CborAuxdataValue’s usage of a hex-encoded Vec is well-labeled; ensures clarity on how data is stored.
11-22: Offset & references
Establishing Offset, Offsets, ImmutableReferences, and LinkReferences provides a clear, consistent approach to referencing code slices.
libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/creation_code_artifacts.rs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Improved type safety with specific types
The change from Option<Value> to specific types (CborAuxdata, LinkReferences) enhances type safety and provides better compile-time guarantees. The trait's default implementations correctly return None.
Also applies to: 6-10
Line range hint 18-26: LGTM: Reference implementation follows Rust best practices
The reference implementation correctly delegates to the inner type using (*self) dereferencing, maintaining consistent behavior with the base trait.
libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/verification_match_values.rs (1)
32-38: LGTM: Improved API ergonomics with builder pattern
The changes enhance usability by:
- Accepting any type that can convert into Bytes
- Supporting method chaining with
&mut Selfreturn
libs/verification-common/src/verifier_alliance/runtime_code_artifacts.rs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Consistent type safety improvements
The changes align with the improvements in creation_code_artifacts.rs, using specific types instead of generic Value. The trait's default implementations are correct.
Also applies to: 6-14
Line range hint 55-71: LGTM: Well-implemented merge behavior
The From implementation for the tuple correctly handles the precedence of merged artifacts over base artifacts, maintaining a consistent merge strategy across all fields.
|
nit: update crate version since it's public crate? |
rimrakhimov
deleted the
rimrakhimov/verification-common/implement-transformations
branch
Add actual transformation implementations. There were just placeholders before
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests