Add prefix: creativebiolabs

[nagutm]

This pull request addresses the following issue: #1257

Creative Biolabs provides identifiers for various antibody related entities. Their website lists the following categories of products that have unique identifiers which I decided to break into 2 broad semantic spaces:

• creativebiolabs.antibody: Recombinant antibodies, Functional antibodies, AbPlus, Formats, Research area, Engineered antibodies, AbProcessing
• creativebiolabs.protein: Tetramers, Proteolytic enzymes, Antibody-like Scaffold proteins, Therapeutic protein, Soluble T Cell receptor

I also considered further dividing these into 5 semantic subspaces to include creativebiolabs.enzyme, creativebiolabs.processing and creativebiolabs.research and even leaving it as a single all encompassing prefix.

I was unable to track down a specific point of contact for this resource and have currently left in some placeholder information for the original contributor of this resource as well.

[bgyori]

@cthoyt since @garybrandam is not responding but the resource is still worth adding, we were planning to switch to @nagutm as contributor and finalize the PR.

[cthoyt]

I'm skeptical about adding these since the contributor isn't responsive, there isn't a way to resolve these IDs, and I guess there isn't a way to get a full list of identifiers.

I'm curious what makes you think it's worth adding. Have you seen these identifiers appear in some other data resource? Is it valuable just for the fact that it addresses a community suggestion? Or maybe something else?

There are various places where I've written notes on my thought process for what makes something worthy but I don't think I've prepare a centralized guide before.

If you can take care of deleting the group email then this is good enough for now.

[cthoyt]

Please remove the contact - [email protected] - before merging, again, because the Bioregistry policy is only to include explicit single point of contacts.

[bgyori]

I'm skeptical about adding these since the contributor isn't responsive, there isn't a way to resolve these IDs, and I guess there isn't a way to get a full list of identifiers.

I'm curious what makes you think it's worth adding. Have you seen these identifiers appear in some other data resource? Is it valuable just for the fact that it addresses a community suggestion? Or maybe something else?

I don't have a strong feeling about it, it's just that (1) someone explicitly suggested it (2) the work of curating the resource is already done and (3) it appears to be a legitimate, and notable resource, in particular as a producer of antibodies, so being able to refer to their catalogue numbers via CURIEs in a principled way seems like a nice thing to have for the community in general.

There are various places where I've written notes on my thought process for what makes something worthy but I don't think I've prepare a centralized guide before.

If you can take care of deleting the group email then this is good enough for now.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 44.48%. Comparing base (8950e70) to head (862835c).
Report is 170 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1260      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   42.51%   44.48%   +1.97%     
==========================================
  Files         117      118       +1     
  Lines        8327     8268      -59     
  Branches     1963     1358     -605     
==========================================
+ Hits         3540     3678     +138     
+ Misses       4582     4413     -169     
+ Partials      205      177      -28     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.