Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] OWFeatureConstructor: Fix domain check for only meta data sets #1632

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2016

Conversation

nikicc
Copy link
Contributor

@nikicc nikicc commented Oct 6, 2016

This is ugly, but since domain does not iterate over metas, I do not know of a better solution.

@ajdapretnar this should fix your feature constructor issues with twitter data set.

@nikicc nikicc changed the title OWFeatureConstructor: Fix domain check for only meta data sets [FIX] OWFeatureConstructor: Fix domain check for only meta data sets Oct 6, 2016
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 6, 2016

Current coverage is 88.66% (diff: 100%)

Merging #1632 into master will not change coverage

@@             master      #1632   diff @@
==========================================
  Files            78         78          
  Lines          8124       8124          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
  Hits           7203       7203          
  Misses          921        921          
  Partials          0          0          

Sunburst

Powered by Codecov. Last update 751f676...b01af5a

@janezd janezd merged commit f539789 into biolab:master Oct 6, 2016
@kernc
Copy link
Contributor

kernc commented Oct 6, 2016

Anything that is ugly / hackish / potentially non-evident warrants a short comment.

@nikicc nikicc deleted the fieature-constructor-only-metas branch October 6, 2016 20:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants