Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal | Move tasks load and list to run command #290

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

angelofenoglio
Copy link
Contributor

@angelofenoglio angelofenoglio commented Oct 17, 2024

What?

  • Move tasks loading and listing options to the run command.

Why?

  • Having all tasks-related actions grouped under the run command creates a more cohesive user experience.
  • As a caveat, this creates a breaking change.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Streamlined command-line tool interface by removing unnecessary options.
    • Introduced new command-line options for the run function, allowing users to specify a build file and list available tasks.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling for task execution scenarios.
  • Chores

    • Added requests dependency to enhance project functionality.

@angelofenoglio angelofenoglio requested a review from a team October 17, 2024 20:10
@angelofenoglio angelofenoglio self-assigned this Oct 17, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11392286286

Details

  • 6 of 11 (54.55%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
  • 33 unchanged lines in 4 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.05%) to 59.856%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
leverage/leverage.py 1 2 50.0%
leverage/modules/run.py 5 9 55.56%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
leverage/leverage.py 1 84.62%
leverage/modules/run.py 1 51.06%
leverage.py 3 84.62%
modules/run.py 28 51.06%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 11222088369: -0.05%
Covered Lines: 2448
Relevant Lines: 3930

💛 - Coveralls

@angelofenoglio angelofenoglio marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2024 19:02
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the leverage command-line tool and the run function within the leverage/modules directory. The leverage command has been streamlined by removing the --filename and --list-tasks options, simplifying its function signature. Conversely, the run function has been enhanced with the addition of these options, allowing users to specify a build file and list available tasks. Additionally, the pyproject.toml file has been updated to include the requests dependency.

Changes

File Change Summary
leverage/leverage.py Removed --filename and --list-tasks options; updated function signature to def leverage(context, state, verbose).
leverage/modules/run.py Added --filename and --list-tasks options; updated function signature to def run(state, filename, list_tasks, tasks).
pyproject.toml Added requests dependency with version "2.31" under [tool.poetry.dependencies].

Poem

In the garden of code, changes bloom bright,
Options once plenty, now simplified light.
With new paths to run, and tasks to explore,
A rabbit hops forth, eager for more!
Requests now in tow, we leap with delight,
In this world of commands, everything feels right! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
leverage/leverage.py (1)

24-25: Remove redundant comment and consider UX improvement.

The comment "leverage called with no subcommand" is redundant as the code is self-explanatory. Additionally, consider adding a deprecation notice in the help message to guide users who might be using old command-line options.

-        # leverage called with no subcommand
         click.echo(context.get_help())
+        click.echo("\nNote: '--filename' and '--list-tasks' options have been moved to the 'run' command.")
leverage/modules/run.py (1)

55-59: Add test coverage for list-tasks functionality.

According to the coverage report, this section needs additional test coverage. Current coverage for leverage/modules/run.py is 55.56% (5 out of 9 lines).

Would you like me to help generate test cases for:

  • List tasks with default build file
  • List tasks with custom build file
  • Error cases for invalid build files
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2992536 and 8314829.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • leverage/leverage.py (1 hunks)
  • leverage/modules/run.py (2 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
pyproject.toml (1)

42-42: Verify the necessity of requests library and update version constraint.

  1. The addition of the requests library seems unrelated to the PR's objective of moving task functionality. Could you clarify why HTTP capabilities are needed for the task management features?

  2. The version constraint "2.31" is very specific and might cause dependency conflicts. Consider using a more flexible version range following semantic versioning:

-requests = "2.31"
+requests = "^2.31"

Let's check if the requests library is actually used in the codebase:

leverage/modules/run.py (4)

10-11: LGTM! Import changes align with the module's new responsibilities.

The new imports properly support the relocated task management functionality, with appropriate use of aliasing for internal usage.


34-40: LGTM! Well-structured CLI options with clear documentation.

The new options follow Click's best practices with:

  • Sensible defaults
  • Both long and short forms
  • Clear help messages
  • Appropriate option types

52-54: LGTM! Clean implementation of task loading.

The task loading logic is well-structured and follows the single responsibility principle.


41-44: Verify impact of breaking change in function signature.

The signature change from run(state, tasks) to run(state, filename, list_tasks, tasks) is a breaking change that could affect existing code.

@click.option("-v", "--verbose", is_flag=True, help="Increase output verbosity.")
@click.version_option(version=__version__)
@pass_state
@click.pass_context
def leverage(context, state, filename, list_tasks, verbose):
def leverage(context, state, verbose):
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Breaking changes need to be documented in the codebase

The functionality has been moved from the main leverage function to the run command, but this breaking change isn't properly documented. Please:

  1. Update the docstring in leverage/leverage.py to mention that task-related options have been moved to the run command
  2. Add a note in the README.md under the "Note for migration from previous versions" section about this breaking change
  3. Consider adding a deprecation notice in the documentation site mentioned at https://leverage.binbash.co/user-guide/leverage-cli/installation/

Example locations that need updates:

  • leverage/leverage.py: Update docstring to reflect the simplified interface
  • README.md: Add migration note about task-related options moving to run command
  • Documentation site: Update CLI usage guide
🔗 Analysis chain

Document breaking changes and provide migration guide.

The removal of filename and list_tasks parameters is a breaking change that could affect existing implementations. Consider:

  1. Updating the docstring to reflect the parameter changes
  2. Adding a note about migrating to the new run command for these features

Let's verify if there are any existing documentation files that need updates:


Let's check the content of README.md to see if it contains any documentation about the CLI usage and if it needs updates:


Let's check if there's any existing documentation about the CLI usage and parameters in the codebase, particularly focusing on the documentation site mentioned in the README:


Let's check the content of both files to understand how the functionality has been moved and if there's any existing documentation about the migration:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation files that might need updates
fd -e md -e rst . | grep -i -E 'readme|guide|doc|changelog|breaking'

Length of output: 80


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check README.md content
cat README.md

Length of output: 7564


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any additional documentation files or usage examples
rg -l "leverage\(.*context.*state" --type py
rg -l "filename.*list.*tasks" --type py

Length of output: 133


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of both files
echo "=== leverage.py ==="
cat leverage/leverage.py
echo -e "\n=== run.py ==="
cat leverage/modules/run.py

Length of output: 7152

requests = "2.31"

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove invalid line.

Line 43 contains an invalid standalone number that should be removed as it's not valid TOML syntax.

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants