ADR-80: CEE diagnostic gathering mechanism

[k-wall]

Draft and placeholder for ADR 78

Signed-off-by: kwall [email protected]

[k-wall]

@tombentley @emmanuelbernard could you review please?

[tombentley]

A few typos, but LGTM.

[k-wall]

@emmanuelbernard would you mind merging?

[emmanuelbernard]

I will merge it but I think it needs a different title.

Since these are open source, any obscure function name is not helping.
I propose to rename CEE with a support organization.

The one other question I had was whether it was java diagnosing or generic diagnosing mechanism regardless of technology? That might also influence the title.

CC @k-wall

@tombentley where can we capture these generic writing guidelines?
Anther one is to one line per sentence model that we can discuss but that I've found useful in markdown and asciidoc documents https://emmanuelbernard.com/blog/2014/10/06/one-line-per-ide-feedback/

Finally where should I bring these feedback on a proto ADR? An issue created already? Here in the PR about to be merged?

[tombentley]

@emmanuelbernard

@tombentley where can we capture these generic writing guidelines?

pages/about/adr-process.adoc is probably the best place for now, but we might want to have separate pages for the ADR process vs the ADR content. I've opened #36 to track the need for this doc.

Finally where should I bring these feedback on a proto ADR? An issue created already? Here in the PR about to be merged?

I've opened #35 if that's what you mean by proto ADR? If so, feel free to comment there.

[emmanuelbernard]

I've opened #35 if that's what you mean by proto ADR? If so, feel free to comment there.

No I meant where / how to discuss the content of ADR-80. Sorry for my "creative" namings.

[tombentley]

Comments on the PR then. I think issues in this repo should be limited to:

• Proposed ADRs
• Issues for the website itself (tracking tasks we want to get to eventually)