Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update package build configuration to include missing dependencies #33

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 5, 2024

Conversation

m0rl
Copy link
Member

@m0rl m0rl commented Feb 3, 2024

fhirpathpy package installed into a virtualenv fails to run evaluate raising

ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'dateutil'

@m0rl m0rl requested review from ir4y and atuonufure February 3, 2024 14:39
@m0rl m0rl self-assigned this Feb 3, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c298e2e) 89.23% compared to head (f14e3e7) 89.23%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #33   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.23%   89.23%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        3548     3548           
=======================================
  Hits         3166     3166           
  Misses        382      382           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 89.23% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

pyproject.toml Outdated
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ license = { file = "LICENSE.md" }
keywords = ["fhir", "fhirpath"]
dynamic = ["version"]
authors = [{ name = "beda.software", email = "[email protected]" }]
dependencies = ["antlr4-python3-runtime~=4.10"]
dependencies = ["antlr4-python3-runtime~=4.10", "python-dateutil==2.8.2"]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we use python-dateutil~=2.8.2 to not stick with a specific version of python-dateutil @m0rl ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, updated the PR to use compatible releases instead.

@m0rl m0rl merged commit a9c5e61 into master Feb 5, 2024
6 checks passed
@m0rl m0rl deleted the m0rl-missing-dateutil-dependency branch February 5, 2024 14:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants