Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MARP-1453: Truststore for mailstore connector #37

Merged

Conversation

nqhoan-axonivy
Copy link
Contributor

Implement SSLContext
Adapt demo

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Test Results

9 tests  ±0   9 ✅ ±0   4s ⏱️ ±0s
1 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit b28f39e. ± Comparison against base commit d4f516d.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

@phhung-axonivy phhung-axonivy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should you check the dev build or ignore that build?

CertificateException, IOException, KeyManagementException {
TrustManagerFactory tmFactory = initDefaultTrustManagerFactory();
// Backup default Certificates
X509TrustManager defaultX509CertTM = getFirstX509TrustManagerFromFactory(tmFactory);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can the value of defaultX509CertTM be null?
If yes, maybe the system will throw NullPointerException somewhere.

Copy link
Contributor

@phhung-axonivy phhung-axonivy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@nqhoan-axonivy nqhoan-axonivy merged commit 35f0932 into master Dec 17, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@nqhoan-axonivy nqhoan-axonivy deleted the feature/MARP-1453-Truststore-for-mailstore-connector branch December 17, 2024 07:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants