-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(cli-integ): new test case for proxied requests #32254
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.
A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request
. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request
to a comment.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #32254 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 77.17% 77.17%
=======================================
Files 105 105
Lines 7169 7169
Branches 1315 1315
=======================================
Hits 5533 5533
Misses 1455 1455
Partials 181 181
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
➡️ PR build request submitted to A maintainer must now check the pipeline and add the |
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ function getRegionFromIniFile(profile: string, data?: any) { | |||
function tryGetCACert(bundlePath?: string) { | |||
const path = bundlePath || caBundlePathFromEnvironment(); | |||
if (path) { | |||
debug('Using CA bundle path: %s', bundlePath); | |||
debug('Using CA bundle path: %s', path); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Codecov is failing because we don't have any unit test for this part, but the integ test in this PR covers precisely this branch.
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
This important scenario was missing from the integ test suite.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license