-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
catch common resource schema issues in cfn validate #663
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -21,4 +21,4 @@ good-names=e,ex,f,fp,i,j,k,n,_ | |
[FORMAT] | ||
|
||
indent-string=' ' | ||
max-line-length=88 | ||
max-line-length=160 |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions
14
tests/data/schema/valid/invalid_list_api_options_as_properties.json
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"typeName" : "AWS::Service::Type", | ||
"description" : "", | ||
"additionalProperties" : false, | ||
"properties" : { | ||
"NextToken" : { | ||
"type" : "string" | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"readOnlyProperties": [ | ||
"/properties/NextToken" | ||
], | ||
"primaryIdentifier" : [ "/properties/NextToken" ] | ||
} |
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions
17
tests/data/schema/valid/invalid_readOnlyProperties_overlap.json
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"typeName" : "AWS::Service::Type", | ||
"description" : "", | ||
"additionalProperties" : false, | ||
"properties" : { | ||
"Property" : { | ||
"type" : "string" | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"readOnlyProperties": [ | ||
"/properties/Property" | ||
], | ||
"createOnlyProperties": [ | ||
"/properties/Property" | ||
], | ||
"primaryIdentifier" : [ "/properties/Property" ] | ||
} |
21 changes: 21 additions & 0 deletions
21
tests/data/schema/valid/invalid_wildcard_handler_permissions.json
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"typeName" : "AWS::Service::Type", | ||
"description" : "", | ||
"additionalProperties" : false, | ||
"properties" : { | ||
"Property" : { | ||
"type" : "string" | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"readOnlyProperties": [ | ||
"/properties/Property" | ||
], | ||
"primaryIdentifier" : [ "/properties/Property" ], | ||
"handlers": { | ||
"create": { | ||
"permissions": [ | ||
"service:create*" | ||
] | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible for users to successfully submit their resources when these warning are logged? If yes, should we throw an exception and stop them from submitting?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As it's currently written, yes
I've also been debating this. We should have enforced some of these from the start, but it's trickier now to suddenly introduce backwards incompatible breaking changes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should do it, maybe with a major version bump and a release announcement that the changes are backward incompatible. Users can stick with a specific version until they are ready to upgrade.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think this is something we can introduce in the future, but i think these warnings are still valuable for customers to see before upgrading. usually with some backwards incompatible change there's a period of warning about an upcoming change in behavior, then a flip of some kind. we can use this as an opportunity to introduce the warnings then remove the functionality at a later date
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree NOT to introduce backward incompatible change as because there are some resources have it's special cases which it will break them.
Warning is good at this point to alert.