Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(dynamic_obstacle_avoidance): improve avoidance for moving NPCs #1170

Conversation

beyzanurkaya
Copy link
Contributor

@beyzanurkaya beyzanurkaya commented Sep 18, 2024

Description

Fixes :

Related links

Parent Issue :

Tests performed

when dynamic_obstacle_avoidance is enable

NTR-002-0001-case1.-.Passed.all.cases.mp4
NTR-002-0001-case2.-.Passed.all.cases.mp4

Interface changes

ROS Parameter Changes

Parameter Name Updated Value Update Description
lat_offset_from_obstacle 0.3 lower lateral offset to avoid moving NPCs in narrow road
margin_distance_around_pedestrian 0.8 lower lateral offset to for pedestrian
end_time_to_consider 1.0 lower end_time_to_consider

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

@beyzanurkaya beyzanurkaya self-assigned this Sep 18, 2024
@beyzanurkaya beyzanurkaya added the component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) label Sep 18, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) label Sep 18, 2024
@brkay54 brkay54 self-requested a review September 18, 2024 18:51
brkay54 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
@beyzanurkaya beyzanurkaya force-pushed the fix-dynamic-obstacle-avoidance-for-dense-urban-odd branch from 10c95fa to 1b7f738 Compare September 22, 2024 18:49
@beyzanurkaya beyzanurkaya added component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) tag:run-build-and-test-differential labels Sep 22, 2024
@beyzanurkaya beyzanurkaya force-pushed the fix-dynamic-obstacle-avoidance-for-dense-urban-odd branch from 1b7f738 to ed273a0 Compare September 29, 2024 11:54
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) label Sep 29, 2024
@beyzanurkaya beyzanurkaya force-pushed the fix-dynamic-obstacle-avoidance-for-dense-urban-odd branch from ed273a0 to f060c23 Compare September 29, 2024 11:55
brkay54 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
@beyzanurkaya beyzanurkaya force-pushed the fix-dynamic-obstacle-avoidance-for-dense-urban-odd branch 3 times, most recently from 0f7a87d to 7e2063d Compare September 30, 2024 17:21
brkay54 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
Copy link
Member

@brkay54 brkay54 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With this PR, dynamic avoidance related scenarios have passed: AWF_Test_Report

@beyzanurkaya beyzanurkaya force-pushed the fix-dynamic-obstacle-avoidance-for-dense-urban-odd branch from 7e2063d to c7713ab Compare October 2, 2024 09:04
@brkay54
Copy link
Member

brkay54 commented Oct 2, 2024

@takayuki5168 san, could you check this PR when you are available or can you assign someone to review?

Copy link
Contributor

@yuki-takagi-66 yuki-takagi-66 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel these parameters are acceptable only the velocity is sufficient slow.
I suggest to apply this change to your fork branch.
As another option I request to relax the value so that there is no problem even at 40 km/h.

@beyzanurkaya
Copy link
Contributor Author

I feel these parameters are acceptable only the velocity is sufficient slow. I suggest to apply this change to your fork branch. As another option I request to relax the value so that there is no problem even at 40 km/h.

Thank you for comment @yuki-takagi-66 -san. Is this comment valid for all 3 modified values ​​or do you have doubts about any of them specifically?

@beyzanurkaya
Copy link
Contributor Author

In this scenario, NPC's velocity is 40 km/h but still passing

2024-10-02.16-09-00.mp4

@xmfcx xmfcx merged commit e14b2c8 into autowarefoundation:main Nov 26, 2024
11 checks passed
go-sakayori added a commit to tier4/autoware_launch that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Dense-Urban-ODD] Improve avoidance for moving NPCs in same and opposite direction of ego driving
4 participants