Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add how-to guide for Quantity template params #343

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2024

Conversation

chiphogg
Copy link
Contributor

@chiphogg chiphogg commented Dec 6, 2024

These are documented already, but under the somewhat obscure heading of
"NTTP" inside of the Quantity docs. I think it will be easier for end
users to discover this if we make a how-to guide, and if we name it
"quantity template parameters" --- a name that is more relatable and
easier to understand.

Follow-up to #316.

These are documented already, but under the somewhat obscure heading of
"NTTP" inside of the Quantity docs.  I think it will be easier for end
users to discover this if we make a how-to guide, and if we name it
"quantity template parameters".  This name is easier for end users to
understand.

Follow-up to #316.
@chiphogg chiphogg added the release notes: 📝 documentation PR affecting library documentation label Dec 6, 2024
@chiphogg chiphogg requested a review from geoffviola December 6, 2024 23:55
Copy link
Contributor

@geoffviola geoffviola left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The documentations looks good. I like the details in the under the hood section and the example was nice.

@chiphogg chiphogg merged commit 7d4530c into main Dec 9, 2024
13 checks passed
@chiphogg chiphogg deleted the chiphogg/quantity-template-param#316 branch December 9, 2024 14:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release notes: 📝 documentation PR affecting library documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants