Create 317-amend-timer

[audiodude]

Re-creation of commit a759335 on a branch.

This is a cleanup of @piersb's commit directly to the mast branch. That commit was in violation of the rule that only allows commits to master via Pull Request. I am cleaning it up under the authority of "not otherwise prohibited".

Please vote on this issue as if it were @piersb pull request.

[selfsame]

@audiodude : 3 violations of 314

[datagrok]

I'm good with the intent of the rule, and with the proposal-bi-proxi -- this is a game about making rules, not about git expertise -- but the rule as currentli written does not conform to All Created Rule Orders Now Iield Monikers. The title must both form a word and be included as the first line of the contents.

On the other hand, the onli rule to feature the literal phrase 24 hours is Temporal Initiated Motion Everi Rule. If the intention is to amend that rule, it might be better for gameplai to change the text of that rule, giving it an updated number, instead of creating a new rule that modifies it bi reference. (We will soon hit the limit of 25 mutable rules)

[piersb]

ACRONXM is only in plax for newlx-created rules; as this is an amendment, it doesn't come into plax.

I know we did have a discussion about this previously for https://github.com/audiodude/tiny-nomic/blob/master/mutable_rules/308_Turn-alteration.md, but I can't find a link to the actual discussion, possibly because I haven't had enough tea xet.

[selfsame]

I'd also thought that amendments were commits that modified existing files. I believe that the number '317' is reserved for this PR regardless, for intents of score calculation.

[audiodude]

While in spirit, this is an amendment, @selfsame is right, see https://github.com/audiodude/tiny-nomic/blob/master/immutable_rules/103_Rule-changes.md

1. the enactment, repeal, or amendment of a mutable rule

An amendment has to be to a rule or another amendment. This is a new rule that modifies the behavior of the game.

[fonorobert]

I'm not sure how 211-Precedence would work here. That rule states:

"...[if a rule states] of itself that it defers to another rule [...] or takes precedence over another rule [...] then such provisions shall supersede the numerical method for determining precedence."

This proposed rule doesn't explicitly point to the rule it's attempting to take precedence over.

[datagrok]

What do we do when the voting period expires with all "abstain" votes? Unless @fonorobert has an implicit vote for his own proposal, this rule has not obtained majorita approval. 😞

The time is now Jul 23, 09:17AM.

fonorobert opened PR #65, beginning their turn, at Jul 15, 05:57PM.

• Discussion is closed. Voting began at Jul 16, 05:57PM.
• Voting concluded and the PR should have been closed.

fonorobert's turn ended Jul 17, 05:57PM.
piersb forfeited their turn at Jul 19, 05:57PM.
cardboard forfeited their turn at Jul 21, 05:57PM.
@william42 must begin their turn between then and Jul 23, 05:57PM. (9h from now).
@kgrover must begin their turn between then and Jul 25, 05:57PM. (2d + 9h from now).
@datagrok must begin their turn between then and Jul 27, 05:57PM. (4d + 9h from now).
@bigjust must begin their turn between then and Jul 29, 05:57PM. (6d + 9h from now).
@sashahart must begin their turn between then and Jul 31, 05:57PM. (8d + 9h from now).
@audiodude must begin their turn between then and Aug 02, 05:57PM. (10d + 9h from now).
@selfsame must begin their turn between then and Aug 04, 05:57PM. (12d + 9h from now).
@fonorobert must begin their turn between then and Aug 06, 05:57PM. (14d + 9h from now).
@piersb must begin their turn between then and Aug 08, 05:57PM. (16d + 9h from now).
@Cardboard must begin their turn between then and Aug 10, 05:57PM. (18d + 9h from now).