-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 717
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: re-add studio document validation
and change code snippet
#2276
docs: re-add studio document validation
and change code snippet
#2276
Conversation
changes: - Re-added the `studio document validation` in the next-major-spec branch. - Changed the code snippet to match v3.
✅ Deploy Preview for shimmering-choux-eb0798 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AnimeshKumar923 made some suggestions
<Remember> | ||
|
||
If you did not follow the previous tutorial and do not have an `asyncapi.yaml` file ready, then generate one using `asyncapi new --example=tutorial.yml --no-tty` command. | ||
|
||
</Remember> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this should be here in this tutorial as this tutorial is about validating invalid document in studio, basing on example provided in studio - and command under remember
note talks about generating a valid document
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@derberg
okay, so if the command generates a valid document, it should not be there. Any command to generate and invalid one? If not there is a way to generate one from AsyncAPI Studio as far as I've tested. Thoughts? 👀
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nah, I will just remove it
applied suggestion from: asyncapi#2276 (comment) Co-authored-by: Lukasz Gornicki <[email protected]>
applied suggstion from: asyncapi#2276 (comment) Co-authored-by: Lukasz Gornicki <[email protected]>
applied suggestion from: asyncapi#2276 (comment) Co-authored-by: Lukasz Gornicki <[email protected]>
applied suggestion from: asyncapi#2276 (comment) Co-authored-by: Lukasz Gornicki <[email protected]>
applied suggestion from: asyncapi#2276 (comment) Co-authored-by: Lukasz Gornicki <[email protected]>
applied suggestion from: asyncapi#2276 (comment) Co-authored-by: Lukasz Gornicki <[email protected]>
applied suggestion from: asyncapi#2276 (comment) Co-authored-by: Lukasz Gornicki <[email protected]>
applied suggestion from: https://github.com/asyncapi/website/pull/2276/files#r1386867168 Co-authored-by: Lukasz Gornicki <[email protected]>
/rtm |
Description
studio document validation
in the next-major-spec branch.Related issue(s)
Fixes #1862