docs: added table of contents and introduction document for Studio tool

[Jagrutiti]

Description

Added the following document for Studio tool for #552

• Table of contents
• Introduction

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for modest-rosalind-098b67 ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	c470434
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/modest-rosalind-098b67/deploys/660df33c0fcd370008c706de
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-553--modest-rosalind-098b67.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[github-actions]

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request. Please check out our contributors guide useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

[Jagrutiti]

Hey @alequetzalli, @derberg , @Florence-Njeri,

I have added Table of Contents and Introduction document in this PR. (I used Generator documentation for guidance)

For Usage, I was unable to think of what content to start with.

Usage is not possible without explaining the Navigation Panel. What if I am not left with unique content for each document.

[quetzalliwrites]

For Usage, I was unable to think of what content to start with.
Usage is not possible without explaining the Navigation Panel. What if I am not left with unique content for each document.

lol don't freak out yet @Jagrutiti ... this to me seems like a possibility for removing usage but keeping the other topics in the Table of Contents... thoughts, @magicmatatjahu?

[magicmatatjahu]

@alequetzalli @Jagrutiti Sorry for such a delay! Yes, we can now remove Usage section and add it in the next PRs. Usage of Studio is hard to describe, because you can use it by CLI (start it), by studio.asyncapi.com and by docker - we should think if it's necessary to describe or not, but we can :)

@alequetzalli Should we merge that in this shape?

[magicmatatjahu]

I added some suggestions :) Great work @Jagrutiti !

[Amzani]

/rtm

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[quetzalliwrites]

@Amzani did you accept my commmit suggestions? It doesn't look like it, thus blocking the merge from happening. :)

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[KhudaDad414]

@magicmatatjahu can't merge this PR without your approval. can you take a look?

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this pull request, add a comment with detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific pull request has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this pull request forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️