Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: separate streetlight examples for Kafka and MQTT #548

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2021
Merged

docs: separate streetlight examples for Kafka and MQTT #548

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2021

Conversation

dalelane
Copy link
Collaborator

Main motivation of this was to provide a place to demonstrate
the new Kafka-specific security schemes introduced in
AsyncAPI 2.1.0. It was also a chance to remove the Kafka
bindings from the otherwise-MQTT sample.

The need for this was discussed in
#502

Contributes to: #466

Signed-off-by: Dale Lane [email protected]

Main motivation of this was to provide a place to demonstrate
the new Kafka-specific security schemes introduced in
AsyncAPI 2.1.0. It was also a chance to remove the Kafka
bindings from the otherwise-MQTT sample.

The need for this was discussed in
#502

Contributes to: #466

Signed-off-by: Dale Lane <[email protected]>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Jun 1, 2021

Awesome stuff @dalelane
Thanks 🙏🏼

@fmvilas wanna have a look? I think we need to solve #540 now or after release, it will be hard to review examples long term if we after all create new instances of those + it is kind of inconsistent, that spec is only latest but examples are there for all versions

Copy link
Member

@fmvilas fmvilas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 💯

@fmvilas
Copy link
Member

fmvilas commented Jun 1, 2021

@derberg indeed it's weird to have examples for all versions but only the latest version of the spec. I'd get rid of the examples of older versions.

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Jun 1, 2021

@fmvilas I think we can merge and I'll create a followup cleanup

@fmvilas fmvilas merged commit cc617e9 into asyncapi:2021-06-release Jun 1, 2021
@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.1.0-2021-06-release.3 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.2.0-2021-06-release.1 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants