-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: release for version 2.6.0 of the spec #707
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Tenshi Codes <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: asyncapi-bot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maciej Urbańczyk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tenshi Codes <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: asyncapi-bot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maciej Urbańczyk <[email protected]>
@AceTheCreator |
@AceTheCreator in theory it is good. It will need to be updated after the merge of asyncapi/spec-json-schemas#307 (as this will trigger a package release) that we need to bump in parser |
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! 0 Bugs No Coverage information |
/rtm |
1 similar comment
/rtm |
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.18.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.0.0-next-major.18 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Refs asyncapi/spec#894