add joss paper

[maurerle]

This is the branch for the submission to JOSS.
Our submission will probably be handled here once it is assigned to reviewers:
https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a8843ad1978808dc593b16437a2a029e

create the paper.pdf using
pandoc -s paper.md -o paper.pdf --bibliography paper.bib --citeproc

or officially for joss draft using

docker run --rm \
    --volume $PWD/paper:/data \
    --user $(id -u):$(id -g) \
    --env JOURNAL=joss \
    openjournals/inara

An published JOSS paper from our friends at AMIRIS can be found here: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05041

---

Would be great if you could look over and adjust the paper.md and add things you would like to have mentioned in this software publication :)

---

Note: the submission works just fine with this being on a separate branch, I would just prefer to merge this at the end of the publication process - otherwise we can also let this stay on the paper branch forever.

---

First draft of the paper can be seen here:
paper.pdf

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.90%. Comparing base (16cbea2) to head (c3022ad).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #482   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.90%   75.90%           
=======================================
  Files          51       51           
  Lines        6818     6818           
=======================================
  Hits         5175     5175           
  Misses       1643     1643           

Flag	Coverage Δ
pytest	75.90% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[nick-harder]

@maurerle thanks, looks nice, I have left a bunch of comments. maybe it would have been easier to directly work in the text, but I didn't want to overwrite your text

[nick-harder]

@maurerle from my side everything looks fine. Maybe we should make a new release before you submit this? @kim-mskw @Manish-Khanra everything looks fine from your side?

[maurerle]

I initiated the review process in JOSS, but they did not yet assign reviewers.
It is fine to keep the branch here, until we have the final reviewed version.
So we just have to wait here for now :)

[kim-mskw]

looks fine from your side?

I already requested changes which were handled :)