Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fix][broker] Immediately tombstone Deleted and Free state bundles #22743

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 21, 2024

Conversation

heesung-sn
Copy link
Contributor

@heesung-sn heesung-sn commented May 18, 2024

Motivation

  • Extensible Load Balancer cannot split bundles when a namespace is recreated. The old parent bundle before split (in the Deleted state) could block the next split operation until they are tombstoned by the leader monitor bundle cleanup job.

  • Extensible Load Balancer delays bundle cleanups when a namespace is deleted. Those deleted bundles are stuck in Free state until they are tombstoned by the leader monitor bundle cleanup job. Although this delayed tombstone was introduced for non-transfer unloading, these lingering bundles are not ideal when the namespace is deleted.

Modifications

  • Immediately tombstone Deleted state bundles
  • Set ServiceUnitStateData.force=true when deleting(unloading) namespace bundles. Then, immediately tombstone Free state bundles if force is true.

Verifying this change

  • Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If the box was checked, please highlight the changes

  • Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
  • The public API
  • The schema
  • The default values of configurations
  • The threading model
  • The binary protocol
  • The REST endpoints
  • The admin CLI options
  • The metrics
  • Anything that affects deployment

Documentation

  • doc
  • doc-required
  • doc-not-needed
  • doc-complete

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository: heesung-sn#67

@github-actions github-actions bot added the doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs label May 18, 2024
@heesung-sn heesung-sn requested a review from Demogorgon314 May 18, 2024 13:35
@heesung-sn heesung-sn self-assigned this May 18, 2024
@heesung-sn heesung-sn changed the title [fix][broker] Immediately tombstone Deleted and Free state bundles and enable MultiPhaseBundleUnload for non-transfer unloading [fix][broker] Immediately tombstone Deleted and Free state bundles May 19, 2024
Copy link
Member

@Demogorgon314 Demogorgon314 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.20%. Comparing base (bbc6224) to head (4dcd4ac).
Report is 293 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #22743      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     73.57%   73.20%   -0.38%     
+ Complexity    32624    32577      -47     
============================================
  Files          1877     1889      +12     
  Lines        139502   141433    +1931     
  Branches      15299    15520     +221     
============================================
+ Hits         102638   103531     +893     
- Misses        28908    29905     +997     
- Partials       7956     7997      +41     
Flag Coverage Δ
inttests 27.48% <15.78%> (+2.90%) ⬆️
systests 24.68% <0.00%> (+0.35%) ⬆️
unittests 72.21% <100.00%> (-0.64%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
...dbalance/extensions/ExtensibleLoadManagerImpl.java 81.34% <100.00%> (+1.25%) ⬆️
...xtensions/channel/ServiceUnitStateChannelImpl.java 85.33% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
...r/loadbalance/extensions/manager/SplitManager.java 91.48% <100.00%> (+2.12%) ⬆️
.../loadbalance/extensions/manager/UnloadManager.java 86.79% <100.00%> (-0.97%) ⬇️
...ache/pulsar/broker/namespace/NamespaceService.java 73.58% <100.00%> (+1.35%) ⬆️

... and 350 files with indirect coverage changes

@heesung-sn heesung-sn merged commit 949260f into apache:master May 21, 2024
71 of 74 checks passed
BewareMyPower added a commit to BewareMyPower/pulsar that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2024
…t channel

### Motivation

NPE will happen in `UnloadManager#handleEvent` after
apache#22743. It's because the `Init`
state is always associated with a null `ServiceUnitStateData`.

```
java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "org.apache.pulsar.broker.loadbalance.extensions.channel.ServiceUnitStateData.force()" because "data" is null
        at org.apache.pulsar.broker.loadbalance.extensions.manager.UnloadManager.handleEvent(UnloadManager.java:204) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.pulsar.broker.loadbalance.extensions.channel.StateChangeListeners.lambda$notify$3(StateChangeListeners.java:74) ~[classes/:?]
        at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CopyOnWriteArrayList.forEach(CopyOnWriteArrayList.java:807) ~[?:?]
        at org.apache.pulsar.broker.loadbalance.extensions.channel.StateChangeListeners.notify(StateChangeListeners.java:72) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.pulsar.broker.loadbalance.extensions.channel.ServiceUnitStateChannelImpl.handleInitEvent(ServiceUnitStateChannelImpl.java:902) ~[classes/:?]
        at org.apache.pulsar.broker.loadbalance.extensions.channel.ServiceUnitStateChannelImpl.handle(ServiceUnitStateChannelImpl.java:715) ~[classes/:?]
```

### Modifications

In `UnloadManager#handleEvent`, assume `data` is null and call
`complete` directly. Fix `UnloadManagerTest`, which passes a non-null
`ServiceUnitStateData` and `Init` to `handleEvent`.
@BewareMyPower BewareMyPower added this to the 3.4.0 milestone Jun 6, 2024
heesung-sn added a commit to heesung-sn/pulsar that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2024
heesung-sn added a commit to heesung-sn/pulsar that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2024
heesung-sn added a commit to heesung-sn/pulsar that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2024
heesung-sn added a commit to heesung-sn/pulsar that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2024
heesung-sn added a commit to heesung-sn/pulsar that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2024
heesung-sn added a commit to heesung-sn/pulsar that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2024
heesung-sn added a commit to heesung-sn/pulsar that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2024
nikhil-ctds pushed a commit to datastax/pulsar that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2024
…pache#22743)

(cherry picked from commit 949260f)
(cherry picked from commit d982d3b)
(cherry picked from commit 44f2e98)
srinath-ctds pushed a commit to datastax/pulsar that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2024
…pache#22743)

(cherry picked from commit 949260f)
(cherry picked from commit d982d3b)
(cherry picked from commit 44f2e98)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants