-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix reading of proto Uint32Value #3113
Open
0x26res
wants to merge
5
commits into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
0x26res:3112-fix-reading-of-proto-uint-32-value
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
An unsigned 32-bit integer might overflow a signed 32-bit integer, right? It would be good to test this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've just added a test using the min and max value of Integer and doing a round trip to make sure we get it back. It looks a bit weird because uint32 are represented as signed 32 bits integer in java, but it works.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think the test really test the out of bounds case. The
Integer.MAX_VALUE
is2^31-1 = 2147483647
, but the unsigned integer could go up to2^32-1 = 4294967295
. Maybe the original author @mwong38 has an opinion on this (I'm not a protobuf expert myself).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here's my understanding.
uint32
is not a java concept. Therefore a protobuf field of typeuint32
, in the java generated code, will be treated as signed 32 bit integer. What java calls anint
.Something like:
Will generate setters and getters that use an
int
:However if I set the value to a negative value, for example
builder.setValue(-1)
and calltoString
, it will correctly interpret it as 4294967295.Again what's important to note is that the underlying representation of a uint32 protobuf type in java is (32bit) int. Say I am to store, from a language that support unsigned integers (eg python), the value of a
uint32
to4294967295
. Then if I read it in java I would get-1
. But if I serialize the message again and pass it back to C or python, I would get back4294967295
which is what I want.I've extended the test to illustrate the behaviour better (adding calls to
toString
). Also I've added-1
on top ofInteger.MIN_VALUE
andInteger.MAX_VALUE
to correctly test the full spectrum of unsigned integer.