Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[flink] Make DPP distribute the splits fairly for flink #4348

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

HuangXingBo
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

The existing DPP assigner implementation first assigns fairly and then assigns according to DPP, which may result in uneven splits for different tasks.

* then distribute the splits fairly.
*/
public class DynamicPartitionPruningPreAssignSplitAssigner extends PreAssignSplitAssigner {
public DynamicPartitionPruningPreAssignSplitAssigner(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add a blank line

.collect(Collectors.toList()));
}

private static boolean filter(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why static?

.collect(Collectors.toList()));
}

private static boolean filter(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change DynamicPartitionPruningAssigner#filter to public static, and then delete DynamicPartitionPruningPreAssignSplitAssigner#filter?

Copy link
Contributor

@yuzelin yuzelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@yuzelin yuzelin merged commit 656d71e into apache:master Oct 22, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants