-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update mvnw and CI on JDK 21 #80
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. But needs the hash regenerating.
@@ -14,6 +14,6 @@ | |||
# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the | |||
# specific language governing permissions and limitations | |||
# under the License. | |||
distributionUrl=https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.9.6/apache-maven-3.9.6-bin.zip | |||
wrapperUrl=https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/wrapper/maven-wrapper/3.2.0/maven-wrapper-3.2.0.jar | |||
distributionSha256Sum=83aaf914c785c9faed661f223000a92d1de9553f5c82d3b4362e66d9c031625f |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please don't remove the hash. Will need regenerating, and mvnw
might also need patching to pass on macOS - see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWRAPPER-150
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this wasn't intended. I simply ran the mvnw updater. Will fix it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it's annoying it doesn't handle this. And that it uses sha256 so the hashes aren't published anywhere. I've just got in the habit of patching these files manually. Thanks for looking at this!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
btw do you want to keep the wrapperUrl
property too? the wrapper did remove that one also.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, that's unused IIRC. Should have removed it when I last updated this.
No description provided.