Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

branch-2.1: [enhance](mtmv)Change the way to verify the existence of partition names when refreshing MTMV #45290 #45725

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #45290

…mes when refreshing MTMV (#45290)

### What problem does this PR solve?

Previously, when refreshing the materialized view according to the
partition name, the existing partition of the materialized view was used
to verify whether the partition name existed
After the change, the partition that should be present after refreshing
the materialized view is used for verification
@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Dec 20, 2024

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@dataroaring dataroaring reopened this Dec 20, 2024
@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Dec 20, 2024

run buildall

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 608000b into branch-2.1 Dec 23, 2024
18 of 19 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the auto-pick-45290-branch-2.1 branch December 23, 2024 02:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants