-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[improvement](build index)Optimize failed task check on same tablet #42295
Conversation
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website. |
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 41517 ms
|
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 191886 ms
|
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 31.56 s
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
need tests
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 41259 ms
|
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 195888 ms
|
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 32.26 s
|
fe/fe-core/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/alter/IndexChangeJob.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
run buildall |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add FE UT, just like SchemaChangeJobV2Test
de4bdee
to
3f8ef95
Compare
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
3f8ef95
to
1aea2d8
Compare
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
@airborne12 Added. |
run buildall |
2 similar comments
run buildall |
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
1 similar comment
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 41565 ms
|
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 193707 ms
|
4ddb65f
to
ef4121a
Compare
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
run performance |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…pache#42295) ## Proposed changes 1. Remove logic for replica majority failure checking 2. Introduce `OBTAIN_LOCK_FAILED` status code both in `status.h` and `Status.thrift` 3. Add `MIN_FAILED_NUM = 3` for non try_lock_failed failure task. The task will try 3 times before canceling the job. 4. Add `MAX_FAILED_NUM = 10` for try_lock_failed failure task. The task will try 10 times before canceling the job. --------- Co-authored-by: qidaye <[email protected]>
…pache#42295) 1. Remove logic for replica majority failure checking 2. Introduce `OBTAIN_LOCK_FAILED` status code both in `status.h` and `Status.thrift` 3. Add `MIN_FAILED_NUM = 3` for non try_lock_failed failure task. The task will try 3 times before canceling the job. 4. Add `MAX_FAILED_NUM = 10` for try_lock_failed failure task. The task will try 10 times before canceling the job. --------- Co-authored-by: qidaye <[email protected]>
…42295) (#43589) bp #42295 Co-authored-by: qidaye <[email protected]>
…42295) (#43581) bp #42295 Co-authored-by: qidaye <[email protected]>
Proposed changes
OBTAIN_LOCK_FAILED
status code both instatus.h
andStatus.thrift
MIN_FAILED_NUM = 3
for non try_lock_failed failure task. The task will try 3 times before canceling the job.MAX_FAILED_NUM = 10
for try_lock_failed failure task. The task will try 10 times before canceling the job.