-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GH-36099: [C++] Add Utf8View and BinaryView to the c ABI #38443
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i've actually wondered.... is there any particular difference (performance or otherwise) doing
.reset(new T)
vs= std::make_unique<T>()
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In scenarios where you have an
std::unique_ptr<ParentClass>
being populated by many sub-classes ofParentClass
:std::make_unique<T, Deleter>(...)
can lead to more binary bloat becauseclass Deleter = std::default_delete<T>
is type-specialized whereasreset()
takes a super-class pointer and only needs the deleter that invokes the destructor via dynamic dispatching through the parent class vtable.Being type-specialized often leads to the derived-classes destructors' being inlined into the
std::default_deleter<T>
. All this extra inlining and removal of one indirection could lead to less overhead of destructor dispatching.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In that case, wouldn't it be better to keep this as calling
.reset
rather than switch tomake_unique
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this case there is no difference since the assigned pointer is a
unique_ptr<SchemaExporter>
and not a pointer to a base/parent class.