-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 185
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: ThoughtChain style #373
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough变更概述演练此次变更主要针对 变更
针对链接问题的评估
可能相关的 PR
建议的审阅者
庆祝诗
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
WalkthroughThis pull request addresses styling issues in the ThoughtChain component by fixing the calculation of certain CSS properties. The changes primarily involve correcting the syntax for calculating the Changes
|
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ const genThoughtChainItemStyle: GenerateThoughtChainItemStyle = (token) => { | |||
|
|||
[`& ${itemCls}-title`]: { | |||
height: token.itemSize, | |||
lineHeight: token.itemSize, | |||
lineHeight: `${unit(token.itemSize)}`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure that the unit
function is correctly imported or defined in this context to avoid runtime errors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bundle ReportChanges will decrease total bundle size by 2 bytes (-0.0%) ⬇️. This is within the configured threshold ✅ Detailed changes
|
size-limit report 📦
|
Deploying ant-design-x with Cloudflare Pages
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/thought-chain/style/index.ts (2)
134-134
: 建议添加注释说明计算逻辑使用
mul(-2)
的计算方式可能会影响元素之间的间距。建议添加注释说明为什么使用这个倍数,以便其他开发者理解这个设计决策。
183-183
: 优秀的单位处理改进使用
unit()
函数处理行高是一个很好的改进,它能确保单位的一致性和类型安全。这种做法值得在其他样式计算中推广。建议检查其他可能需要类似处理的地方:
#!/bin/bash # 检查其他可能需要使用 unit() 的地方 rg "lineHeight: ['\"]?\d+['\"]?" --type ts
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/thought-chain/style/index.ts
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/thought-chain/style/index.ts (1)
121-121
: 请验证间距计算的视觉效果
使用 calc()
计算 bottom 值的方式更加统一,但建议验证在不同尺寸下的视觉对齐效果是否符合预期。
✅ Verification successful
样式计算方式符合组件设计规范
根据代码分析,calc(token.itemGap).mul(-1).equal()
的计算方式在组件中使用一致,并且与其他 token.itemGap
的使用场景相互呼应:
- 在同一文件中有类似的
calc(token.itemGap).mul(-2).equal()
计算 token.itemGap
被用于设置间距、边距和填充,保持了设计系统的一致性- 组件支持不同尺寸(
itemGapLG
、itemGap
、itemGapSM
)的间距设置
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查其他组件是否使用类似的计算方式
ast-grep --pattern 'bottom: calc($$$)'
Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 使用 ripgrep 搜索包含 bottom: calc 的样式定义
rg "bottom:\s*calc" -A 2
# 搜索其他使用 token.itemGap 的样式定义
rg "token\.itemGap"
Length of output: 1165
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #373 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.36% 91.36%
=======================================
Files 66 66
Lines 1448 1448
Branches 383 368 -15
=======================================
Hits 1323 1323
Misses 125 125 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
fix: #371
fix: #366
Summary by CodeRabbit