Document and type hint commands part 3

.config/pydoclint-baseline.txt

@@ -1,44 +1,3 @@
-src/molecule/command/dependency.py
-    DOC101: Method `Dependency.execute`: Docstring contains fewer arguments than in function signature.
-    DOC106: Method `Dependency.execute`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but there are no argument type hints in the signature
-    DOC107: Method `Dependency.execute`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but not all args in the signature have type hints
-    DOC103: Method `Dependency.execute`: Docstring arguments are different from function arguments. (Or could be other formatting issues: https://jsh9.github.io/pydoclint/violation_codes.html#notes-on-doc103 ). Arguments in the function signature but not in the docstring: [action_args: ].
-    DOC101: Function `dependency`: Docstring contains fewer arguments than in function signature.
-    DOC106: Function `dependency`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but there are no argument type hints in the signature
-    DOC107: Function `dependency`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but not all args in the signature have type hints
-    DOC103: Function `dependency`: Docstring arguments are different from function arguments. (Or could be other formatting issues: https://jsh9.github.io/pydoclint/violation_codes.html#notes-on-doc103 ). Arguments in the function signature but not in the docstring: [ctx: , scenario_name: ].
---------------------
-src/molecule/command/destroy.py
-    DOC101: Method `Destroy.execute`: Docstring contains fewer arguments than in function signature.
-    DOC106: Method `Destroy.execute`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but there are no argument type hints in the signature
-    DOC107: Method `Destroy.execute`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but not all args in the signature have type hints
-    DOC103: Method `Destroy.execute`: Docstring arguments are different from function arguments. (Or could be other formatting issues: https://jsh9.github.io/pydoclint/violation_codes.html#notes-on-doc103 ). Arguments in the function signature but not in the docstring: [action_args: ].
-    DOC201: Method `Destroy.execute` does not have a return section in docstring
-    DOC101: Function `destroy`: Docstring contains fewer arguments than in function signature.
-    DOC106: Function `destroy`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but there are no argument type hints in the signature
-    DOC107: Function `destroy`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but not all args in the signature have type hints
-    DOC103: Function `destroy`: Docstring arguments are different from function arguments. (Or could be other formatting issues: https://jsh9.github.io/pydoclint/violation_codes.html#notes-on-doc103 ). Arguments in the function signature but not in the docstring: [__all: , ctx: , driver_name: , parallel: , scenario_name: ].
---------------------
-src/molecule/command/drivers.py
-    DOC101: Function `drivers`: Docstring contains fewer arguments than in function signature.
-    DOC106: Function `drivers`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but there are no argument type hints in the signature
-    DOC107: Function `drivers`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but not all args in the signature have type hints
-    DOC103: Function `drivers`: Docstring arguments are different from function arguments. (Or could be other formatting issues: https://jsh9.github.io/pydoclint/violation_codes.html#notes-on-doc103 ). Arguments in the function signature but not in the docstring: [ctx: , format: ].
---------------------
-src/molecule/command/idempotence.py
-    DOC101: Method `Idempotence.execute`: Docstring contains fewer arguments than in function signature.
-    DOC106: Method `Idempotence.execute`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but there are no argument type hints in the signature
-    DOC107: Method `Idempotence.execute`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but not all args in the signature have type hints
-    DOC103: Method `Idempotence.execute`: Docstring arguments are different from function arguments. (Or could be other formatting issues: https://jsh9.github.io/pydoclint/violation_codes.html#notes-on-doc103 ). Arguments in the function signature but not in the docstring: [action_args: ].
-    DOC106: Method `Idempotence._is_idempotent`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but there are no argument type hints in the signature
-    DOC107: Method `Idempotence._is_idempotent`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but not all args in the signature have type hints
-    DOC106: Method `Idempotence._non_idempotent_tasks`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but there are no argument type hints in the signature
-    DOC107: Method `Idempotence._non_idempotent_tasks`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but not all args in the signature have type hints
-    DOC101: Function `idempotence`: Docstring contains fewer arguments than in function signature.
-    DOC106: Function `idempotence`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but there are no argument type hints in the signature
-    DOC107: Function `idempotence`: The option `--arg-type-hints-in-signature` is `True` but not all args in the signature have type hints
-    DOC103: Function `idempotence`: Docstring arguments are different from function arguments. (Or could be other formatting issues: https://jsh9.github.io/pydoclint/violation_codes.html#notes-on-doc103 ). Arguments in the function signature but not in the docstring: [ansible_args: , ctx: , scenario_name: ].
---------------------
 src/molecule/command/init/base.py
     DOC601: Class `Base`: Class docstring contains fewer class attributes than actual class attributes.  (Please read https://jsh9.github.io/pydoclint/checking_class_attributes.html on how to correctly document class attributes.)
     DOC603: Class `Base`: Class docstring attributes are different from actual class attributes. (Or could be other formatting issues: https://jsh9.github.io/pydoclint/violation_codes.html#notes-on-doc103 ). Attributes in the class definition but not in the docstring: [__metaclass__: ]. (Please read https://jsh9.github.io/pydoclint/checking_class_attributes.html on how to correctly document class attributes.)

src/molecule/command/dependency.py

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 
 
 if TYPE_CHECKING:
-    from molecule.types import CommandArgs
+    from molecule.types import CommandArgs, MoleculeArgs
 
 
 LOG = logging.getLogger(__name__)
@@ -39,9 +39,14 @@
 class Dependency(base.Base):
     """Dependency Command Class."""
 
-    def execute(self, action_args=None):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa: ANN001, ANN201, ARG002
-        """Execute the actions necessary to perform a `molecule dependency` and returns None."""
-        self._config.dependency.execute()  # type: ignore[union-attr]
+    def execute(self, action_args: list[str] | None = None) -> None:  # noqa: ARG002
+        """Execute the actions necessary to perform a `molecule dependency`.
+
+        Args:
+            action_args: Arguments for this command. Unused.
+        """
+        if self._config.dependency:
+            self._config.dependency.execute()  # type: ignore[no-untyped-call]
 
 
 @base.click_command_ex()
@@ -52,9 +57,17 @@ def execute(self, action_args=None):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa: AN
     default=base.MOLECULE_DEFAULT_SCENARIO_NAME,
     help=f"Name of the scenario to target. ({base.MOLECULE_DEFAULT_SCENARIO_NAME})",
 )
-def dependency(ctx, scenario_name):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def] # pragma: no cover  # noqa: ANN001, ANN201
-    """Manage the role's dependencies."""
-    args = ctx.obj.get("args")
+def dependency(
+    ctx: click.Context,
+    scenario_name: str,
+) -> None:  # pragma: no cover
+    """Manage the role's dependencies.
+
+    Args:
+        ctx: Click context object holding commandline arguments.
+        scenario_name: Name of the scenario to target.
+    """
+    args: MoleculeArgs = ctx.obj.get("args")
     subcommand = base._get_subcommand(__name__)  # noqa: SLF001
     command_args: CommandArgs = {"subcommand": subcommand}
 

src/molecule/command/destroy.py

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
 
 
 if TYPE_CHECKING:
-    from molecule.types import CommandArgs
+    from molecule.types import CommandArgs, MoleculeArgs
 
 
 LOG = logging.getLogger(__name__)
@@ -44,14 +44,19 @@
 class Destroy(base.Base):
     """Destroy Command Class."""
 
-    def execute(self, action_args=None):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa: ANN001, ANN201, ARG002
-        """Execute the actions necessary to perform a `molecule destroy` and returns None."""
+    def execute(self, action_args: list[str] | None = None) -> None:  # noqa: ARG002
+        """Execute the actions necessary to perform a `molecule destroy`.
+
+        Args:
+            action_args: Arguments for this command. Unused.
+        """
         if self._config.command_args.get("destroy") == "never":
             msg = "Skipping, '--destroy=never' requested."
             LOG.warning(msg)
             return
 
-        self._config.provisioner.destroy()  # type: ignore[union-attr]
+        if self._config.provisioner:
+            self._config.provisioner.destroy()  # type: ignore[no-untyped-call]
         self._config.state.reset()
 
 
@@ -80,9 +85,23 @@ def execute(self, action_args=None):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa: AN
     default=False,
     help="Enable or disable parallel mode. Default is disabled.",
 )
-def destroy(ctx, scenario_name, driver_name, __all, parallel):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def] # pragma: no cover  # noqa: ANN001, ANN201
-    """Use the provisioner to destroy the instances."""
-    args = ctx.obj.get("args")
+def destroy(
+    ctx: click.Context,
+    scenario_name: str | None,
+    driver_name: str,
+    __all: bool,  # noqa: FBT001
+    parallel: bool,  # noqa: FBT001
+) -> None:  # pragma: no cover
+    """Use the provisioner to destroy the instances.
+
+    Args:
+        ctx: Click context object holding commandline arguments.
+        scenario_name: Name of the scenario to target.
+        driver_name: Molecule driver to use.
+        __all: Whether molecule should target scenario_name or all scenarios.
+        parallel: Whether the scenario(s) should be run in parallel mode.
+    """
+    args: MoleculeArgs = ctx.obj.get("args")
     subcommand = base._get_subcommand(__name__)  # noqa: SLF001
     command_args: CommandArgs = {
         "parallel": parallel,

src/molecule/command/drivers.py

@@ -41,8 +41,16 @@
     default="simple",
     help="Change output format. (simple)",
 )
-def drivers(ctx, format):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def] # pragma: no cover  # noqa: ANN001, ANN201, A002, ARG001
-    """List drivers."""
+def drivers(
+    ctx: click.Context,  # noqa: ARG001
+    format: str,  # noqa: A002
+) -> None:  # pragma: no cover
+    """List drivers.
+
+    Args:
+        ctx: Click context object holding commandline arguments.
+        format: Output format to use.
+    """
     drivers = []  # pylint: disable=redefined-outer-name
     for driver in api.drivers().values():
         description = str(driver)

src/molecule/command/idempotence.py

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 
 
 if TYPE_CHECKING:
-    from molecule.types import CommandArgs
+    from molecule.types import CommandArgs, MoleculeArgs
 
 
 LOG = logging.getLogger(__name__)
@@ -46,24 +46,29 @@ class Idempotence(base.Base):
     the scenario will be considered idempotent.
     """
 
-    def execute(self, action_args=None):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa: ANN001, ANN201, ARG002
-        """Execute the actions necessary to perform a `molecule idempotence` and returns None."""
+    def execute(self, action_args: list[str] | None = None) -> None:  # noqa: ARG002
+        """Execute the actions necessary to perform a `molecule idempotence`.
+
+        Args:
+            action_args: Arguments for this command. Unused.
+        """
         if not self._config.state.converged:
             msg = "Instances not converged.  Please converge instances first."
             util.sysexit_with_message(msg)
 
-        output = self._config.provisioner.converge()  # type: ignore[union-attr]
+        if self._config.provisioner:
+            output = self._config.provisioner.converge()  # type: ignore[no-untyped-call]
 
-        idempotent = self._is_idempotent(output)  # type: ignore[no-untyped-call]
-        if idempotent:
-            msg = "Idempotence completed successfully."
-            LOG.info(msg)
-        else:
-            details = "\n".join(self._non_idempotent_tasks(output))  # type: ignore[no-untyped-call]
-            msg = f"Idempotence test failed because of the following tasks:\n{details}"
-            util.sysexit_with_message(msg)
+            idempotent = self._is_idempotent(output)
+            if idempotent:
+                msg = "Idempotence completed successfully."
+                LOG.info(msg)
+            else:
+                details = "\n".join(self._non_idempotent_tasks(output))
+                msg = f"Idempotence test failed because of the following tasks:\n{details}"
+                util.sysexit_with_message(msg)
 
-    def _is_idempotent(self, output):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa: ANN001, ANN202
+    def _is_idempotent(self, output: str) -> bool:
         """Parse the output of the provisioning for changed and returns a bool.
 
         Args:
@@ -80,7 +85,7 @@ def _is_idempotent(self, output):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa: ANN00
 
         return not bool(changed)
 
-    def _non_idempotent_tasks(self, output):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa: ANN001, ANN202
+    def _non_idempotent_tasks(self, output: str) -> list[str]:
         """Parse the output to identify the non idempotent tasks.
 
         Args:
@@ -120,12 +125,21 @@ def _non_idempotent_tasks(self, output):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa
     help=f"Name of the scenario to target. ({base.MOLECULE_DEFAULT_SCENARIO_NAME})",
 )
 @click.argument("ansible_args", nargs=-1, type=click.UNPROCESSED)
-def idempotence(ctx, scenario_name, ansible_args):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def] # pragma: no cover  # noqa: ANN001, ANN201
+def idempotence(
+    ctx: click.Context,
+    scenario_name: str,
+    ansible_args: tuple[str, ...],
+) -> None:  # pragma: no cover
     """Use the provisioner to configure the instances.
 
     After parse the output to determine idempotence.
+
+    Args:
+        ctx: Click context object holding commandline arguments.
+        scenario_name: Name of the scenario to target.
+        ansible_args: Arguments to forward to Ansible.
     """
-    args = ctx.obj.get("args")
+    args: MoleculeArgs = ctx.obj.get("args")
     subcommand = base._get_subcommand(__name__)  # noqa: SLF001
     command_args: CommandArgs = {"subcommand": subcommand}
 

tests/unit/command/test_dependency.py

@@ -25,6 +25,10 @@
 
 
 if TYPE_CHECKING:
+    from unittest.mock import Mock
+
+    import pytest
+
     from pytest_mock import MockerFixture
 
     from molecule import config
@@ -33,15 +37,15 @@
 # NOTE(retr0h): The use of the `patched_config_validate` fixture, disables
 # config.Config._validate from executing.  Thus preventing odd side-effects
 # throughout patched.assert_called unit tests.
-def test_dependency_execute(  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa: ANN201, D103
+def test_dependency_execute(  # noqa: D103
     mocker: MockerFixture,  # noqa: ARG001
-    caplog,  # noqa: ANN001
-    patched_ansible_galaxy,  # noqa: ANN001
-    patched_config_validate,  # noqa: ANN001, ARG001
+    caplog: pytest.LogCaptureFixture,
+    patched_ansible_galaxy: Mock,
+    patched_config_validate: Mock,  # noqa: ARG001
     config_instance: config.Config,
-):
+) -> None:
     d = dependency.Dependency(config_instance)
-    d.execute()  # type: ignore[no-untyped-call]
+    d.execute()
 
     patched_ansible_galaxy.assert_called_once_with()
 

tests/unit/command/test_destroy.py

@@ -27,34 +27,36 @@
 
 
 if TYPE_CHECKING:
+    from unittest.mock import MagicMock, Mock
+
     from pytest_mock import MockerFixture
 
     from molecule import config
 
 
 @pytest.fixture()
-def _patched_ansible_destroy(mocker):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa: ANN001, ANN202
+def _patched_ansible_destroy(mocker: MockerFixture) -> MagicMock:
     return mocker.patch("molecule.provisioner.ansible.Ansible.destroy")
 
 
 @pytest.fixture()
-def _patched_destroy_setup(mocker):  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa: ANN001, ANN202
+def _patched_destroy_setup(mocker: MockerFixture) -> MagicMock:
     return mocker.patch("molecule.command.destroy.Destroy._setup")
 
 
 # NOTE(retr0h): The use of the `patched_config_validate` fixture, disables
 # config.Config._validate from executing.  Thus preventing odd side-effects
 # throughout patched.assert_called unit tests.
 @pytest.mark.skip(reason="destroy not running for delegated")
-def test_destroy_execute(  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa: ANN201, D103
+def test_destroy_execute(  # noqa: D103
     mocker: MockerFixture,  # noqa: ARG001
-    caplog,  # noqa: ANN001
-    patched_config_validate,  # noqa: ANN001, ARG001
-    _patched_ansible_destroy,  # noqa: ANN001, PT019
+    caplog: pytest.LogCaptureFixture,
+    patched_config_validate: Mock,  # noqa: ARG001
+    _patched_ansible_destroy: Mock,  # noqa: PT019
     config_instance: config.Config,
-):
+) -> None:
     d = destroy.Destroy(config_instance)
-    d.execute()  # type: ignore[no-untyped-call]
+    d.execute()
 
     assert "destroy" in caplog.text
 
@@ -71,16 +73,16 @@ def test_destroy_execute(  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa: ANN201, D103
     ["command_driver_delegated_section_data"],  # noqa: PT007
     indirect=True,
 )
-def test_execute_skips_when_destroy_strategy_is_never(  # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]  # noqa: ANN201, D103
-    _patched_destroy_setup,  # noqa: ANN001, PT019
-    caplog,  # noqa: ANN001
-    _patched_ansible_destroy,  # noqa: ANN001, PT019
+def test_execute_skips_when_destroy_strategy_is_never(  # noqa: D103
+    _patched_destroy_setup: Mock,  # noqa: PT019
+    caplog: pytest.LogCaptureFixture,
+    _patched_ansible_destroy: Mock,  # noqa: PT019
     config_instance: config.Config,
-):
+) -> None:
     config_instance.command_args = {"destroy": "never"}
 
     d = destroy.Destroy(config_instance)
-    d.execute()  # type: ignore[no-untyped-call]
+    d.execute()
 
     msg = "Skipping, '--destroy=never' requested."
     assert msg in caplog.text