-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move over to N-API from NAN #71
Conversation
Drop Node.js version 0.10 and 0.12
Added Node.js vesrion 4 6 7 8 9 10 gor both arch x86 and x64
Update engine to 4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @anandsuresh it seems good to me. It's a good starting point to next release
@NickNaso What would be a good next step? Should we make a PR against the NAPI repo linking this branch to the list of NAPI modules? |
Hi @anandsuresh I linked the issue BAPI Support with an issue on the abi-stable-node repo https://github.com/nodejs/abi-stable-node/issues/246 . In this issue we report our porting activities and if you want fell free to report your experience with N-API. |
@anandsuresh it looks like this is based on an old commit, based on the diff. Are you still planning to move forward with this? There's some code cleanup (around the native build, quite a bit of code that can be removed) that I'd love to contribute, but don't want to mess up your N-API work. On the other hand, you might have an easier time converting to N-API with my proposed cleanup. |
Sure. I haven't had a lot of time to focus on this. If you have any code to
contribute, that would be awesome.
…On Fri, Oct 26, 2018, 1:19 PM Zach Bjornson ***@***.*** wrote:
@anandsuresh <https://github.com/anandsuresh> it looks like this is based
on an old commit, based on the diff. Are you still planning to move forward
with this? There's some code cleanup (around the native build, quite a bit
of code that can be removed) that I'd love to contribute, but don't want to
mess up your N-API work. On the other hand, you might have an easier time
converting to N-API with my proposed cleanup.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#71 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA-tuVjiiDJbtbXFXA5AftOyzXFLogXiks5uo25qgaJpZM4UUaa3>
.
|
I have updated this PR over at https://github.com/ludios/sse4_crc32/commits/master and I am testing it, feel free to take my commits. |
@anandsuresh Hello! Any thoughts on how we should proceed with this migration? |
@ivan would you be willing to send your changes as a PR here? Whatever we can do to make it easier for @anandsuresh to merge and release 🙏 |
Whoops. Sorry guys. Been a little busy lately.
I should have some down-time this week to look this over and get it
merged. Let me know if there is anything else that I can help with.
Thanks
Anand
…On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:28 AM Stephen ***@***.***> wrote:
@ivan <https://github.com/ivan> would you be willing to send your changes
as a PR here? Whatever we can do to make it easier for @anandsuresh
<https://github.com/anandsuresh> to merge and release 🙏
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#71?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAH23OIJYRKZNGYZRX7R463QKDLOJA5CNFSM4FCRU232YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD64QUSA#issuecomment-532220488>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAH23OKS4FB3EXJ3RYLSVMLQKDLOJANCNFSM4FCRU23Q>
.
|
@anandsuresh FYI I think there's a UAF here that I fixed with ludios@d39bdd7 |
No description provided.