Update wordings

ARCs/arc-0071.md

@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Re-usability and Compatibility: SBTs with revocation fit well into W3C and DIF s
 Immutable Attachment: The soul-like bound remains intact. The token does not leave the wallet, making it clear that the SBT is still part of the user’s identity, but with a revoked status.
 In contrast, burning would not allow for these records to be maintained, and would break the "bound" nature of the SBT by removing the token from the holder's possession entirely, which defeats the core idea behind SBTs.
 
-In summary, revocation offers a more technically sound and philosophically consistent alternative to burning for SBTs. It ensures that SBTs remain SoulBound while allowing for expiration, invalidation, or issuer changes, all while maintaining a record of the token’s lifecycle and status.
+In summary, revocation offers a more interoperable alternative to burning for SBTs. It ensures that SBTs remain SoulBound while allowing for expiration, invalidation, or issuer changes, all while maintaining a record of the token’s lifecycle and status.
 
 ## TODO