-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Using local variable in subroutine through frame pointer #606
Conversation
51e3ee0
to
19406de
Compare
eee8381
to
1f96d76
Compare
Maybe we want to handle #562 (comment) in this PR |
remove popn exposure, seems not useful here prototyped. revert test change minor update some note
a73fcd3
to
bff74b1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another great improvement in our war against scratch slots. I left a couple of questions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Upon closer evaluation, I think the original approach using python context-managers is preferred.
Apart from that, there was only one question remaining: how blocked is the PR by #599 ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving as all my major remarks have been addressed.
4483668
to
ff1fc63
Compare
Co-authored-by: Michael Diamant <[email protected]>
cda48e8
to
0f1fe4f
Compare
Co-authored-by: Michael Diamant <[email protected]>
closes #559