Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PHRAS-3520_stamper-enhance #4385

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Nov 22, 2023
Merged

PHRAS-3520_stamper-enhance #4385

merged 14 commits into from
Nov 22, 2023

Conversation

jygaulier
Copy link
Member

@jygaulier jygaulier commented Oct 4, 2023

Changelog

Fixes

  • admin/collection settings (new ux, clean xml)

Adds

  • PHRAS-3520: stamp subdefs of class "preview" ; apply watermark on stamped subdef (cache to be fixed)

Todo

  • clean wm cache when subdef is re-stamped and must be re-watermarked

add: stamp subdefs of class "preview"
apply watermark on stamped subdef (cache to be fixed)
fix: admin/collection settings (new ux, clean xml)
@jygaulier jygaulier added WIP 4.1 DO_NOT_MERGE for tests only; please pull labels Oct 4, 2023
add: stamp subdefs of class "preview"
apply watermark on stamped subdef (cache to be fixed)
fix: admin/collection settings (new ux, clean xml)
…_databox' (and bc true) to restrict right to remove stamp.
add: stamp subdefs of class "preview"
apply watermark on stamped subdef (cache to be fixed)
fix: admin/collection settings (new ux, clean xml)
…_databox' (and bc true) to restrict right to remove stamp.
@jygaulier jygaulier changed the title PHRAS-3520_stamper-enhance WIP DO NOT MERGE PHRAS-3520_stamper-enhance Nov 20, 2023
@jygaulier jygaulier removed WIP DO_NOT_MERGE for tests only; please pull labels Nov 20, 2023
@nmaillat nmaillat merged commit 07f4462 into master Nov 22, 2023
7 checks passed
@nmaillat nmaillat deleted the PHRAS-3520_stamper-enhance branch March 19, 2024 17:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants