Resolve Issue 1386, Add rpc_prefix

[aKardasz]

Description

Adds nuid from nats broker to generation unique ids.
Adds rpc_prefix, to allow support for nats streams inbox_. functionality via permissions, for consistency added the same rpc_prefix to the redis implementation.

Fixes #1386

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Documentation (typos, code examples, or any documentation updates)
• New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)

Checklist

• My code adheres to the style guidelines of this project (scripts/lint.sh shows no errors)
• I have conducted a self-review of my own code
• My changes do not generate any new warnings
• I have added tests to validate the effectiveness of my fix or the functionality of my new feature
• Both new and existing unit tests pass successfully on my local environment by running scripts/test-cov.sh
• I have ensured that static analysis tests are passing by running scripts/static-analysis.sh

[aKardasz]

Statis analysis error, not sure how you guys would like to go about this issue in static analysis.

Test results:
>> Issue: [B311:blacklist] Standard pseudo-random generators are not suitable for security/cryptographic purposes.
   Severity: Low   Confidence: High
   CWE: CWE-330 (https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/330.html)
   More Info: https://bandit.readthedocs.io/en/1.7.8/blacklists/blacklist_calls.html#b311-random
   Location: faststream/utils/nuid.py:40:22
39          def __init__(self) -> None:
40              self._prand = Random(randbelow(max_int))
41              self._seq = self._prand.randint(0, MAX_SEQ)

--------------------------------------------------

Code scanned:
        Total lines of code: 34801
        Total lines skipped (#nosec): 0

Run metrics:
        Total issues (by severity):
                Undefined: 0
                Low: 1
                Medium: 0
                High: 0
        Total issues (by confidence):
                Undefined: 0
                Low: 0
                Medium: 0
                High: 1
Files skipped (0):

[Lancetnik]

We can no worry about this warning due we doesn't use random for cryptography
You can just suppress it

[Lancetnik]

I don't like an idea to add an extra option if nats-py already has the mechanism we can reuse

[aKardasz]

@Lancetnik with the removal of rpc_prefix, realistically that would mean no new tests are needed, would that be a safe assumption since the inbox update would just fall under regular tests.

Also, having a hard time running the tests in github workspaces, maybe we can do a setup guide for others or like a make file what are your thoughts?

[Lancetnik]

@aKardasz I think, we should update CONTRIBUTING file to allow users to contribute easily

About testing - I think we should check NatsBroker(inbox_prefix=...) correct behavior

Can you please add any test for it and then we can merge the branch?

[davorrunje]

Also, having a hard time running the tests in github workspaces, maybe we can do a setup guide for others or like a make file what are your thoughts?

We could create devcontainers with the complete setup for testing particular MQ. That would probably be the best solution.

[aKardasz]

@aKardasz I think, we should update CONTRIBUTING file to allow users to contribute easily

About testing - I think we should check NatsBroker(inbox_prefix=...) correct behavior

Can you please add any test for it and then we can merge the branch?

Let me know if the added test is sufficient.