-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 192
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ORM: Fix deprecation warning being shown for new code types #6407
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -75,13 +75,17 @@ class Code(AbstractCode): | |
def __init__(self, remote_computer_exec=None, local_executable=None, input_plugin_name=None, files=None, **kwargs): | ||
super().__init__(**kwargs) | ||
|
||
warn_deprecation( | ||
'The `Code` class is deprecated. To create an instance, use the ' | ||
'`aiida.orm.nodes.data.code.installed.InstalledCode` or `aiida.orm.nodes.data.code.portable.PortableCode` ' | ||
'for a "remote" or "local" code, respectively. If you are using this class to compare type, e.g. in ' | ||
'`isinstance`, use `aiida.orm.nodes.data.code.abstract.AbstractCode`.', | ||
version=3, | ||
) | ||
# The ``_EMIT_CODE_DEPRECATION_WARNING`` attribute is set in subclasses to avoid the deprecation message below | ||
# is also shown when they are instantiated, since they are not deprecated. | ||
if getattr(self, '_EMIT_CODE_DEPRECATION_WARNING', True): | ||
warn_deprecation( | ||
'The `Code` class is deprecated. To create an instance, use the ' | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This warning might be a bit confusing if it's printed when user tries to create Code via CLI. At the same time the text is already long. 🤷 |
||
'`aiida.orm.nodes.data.code.installed.InstalledCode` or ' | ||
'`aiida.orm.nodes.data.code.portable.PortableCode` for a "remote" or "local" code, respectively. If ' | ||
'you are using this class to compare type, e.g. in ' | ||
'`isinstance`, use `aiida.orm.nodes.data.code.abstract.AbstractCode`.', | ||
version=3, | ||
) | ||
|
||
if remote_computer_exec and local_executable: | ||
raise ValueError('cannot set `remote_computer_exec` and `local_executable` at the same time') | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just for my own understanding; why do we need to usegetattr
instead accessing viaself
directly?Ah, took me a while to understand, this is evil. :D The trick is that this attribute is only defined in child classes, right? Maybe a comment explaining this trick is warranted here.