Explicitly mark all packages with commonjs type
#2414
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
See: https://nodejs.org/api/packages.html#packages_determining_module_system > Package authors should include the "type" field, even in packages where all sources are CommonJS. Being explicit about the type of the package will future-proof the package in case the default type of Node.js ever changes, and it will also make things easier for build tools and loaders to determine how the files in the package should be interpreted. Related issue: #2341
mrtnzlml
force-pushed
the
explicit_packagejson_type
branch
from
484d88e to
588f5aa
Compare
vercel
bot
temporarily deployed
to
Preview – universe-sx-tailwind-website
michalsanger
approved these changes
May 21, 2021
vercel
bot
temporarily deployed
to
Preview – universe-sx-tailwind-website
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See: https://nodejs.org/api/packages.html#packages_determining_module_system
Related issue: #2341