-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Add Turbo Compass. #15
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
lam=10.0, | ||
n_epochs=100, | ||
verbose=False))), | ||
train_ratio=0.8, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One simple improvement after discussing with Richard Zhang is to make the size of the cross-validation set adaptive:
- When we start off we have little data, so maybe a 80/20 split produces too small a validation set size.
- Once we have more data, a 80/20 split might be too big, i.e. we are being too conservative as the algorithm progresses (because we shrink the training set size more than necessary), and as a consequence calling Compass more than we should to meet the user's specified reconstruction quality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It sounds to me that what would be ideal would be to use a fixed CV size for each reaction, say size 50. In that case I would need to implement another concretion for CVMatrixCompletionModel
which performs CV splitting based on a fixed CV size, rather than on a percentage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(or, rather than creating a new concretion, cleverly factor out the CV-splitting behavior to get the new behavior via composition)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or maybe, it's easier to just add a max_cv_size
argument to the TrainValSplitCVMatrixCompletionModel
API.
Was able to install on the server and run the test suite.