Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lca reconstruct #238

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 8, 2024
Merged

Lca reconstruct #238

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 8, 2024

Conversation

mattjones315
Copy link
Collaborator

Found a small bug in which the reconstructed LCA of a set of ambiguous states would default to 0, even if there was non-zero overlap between the states. This small PR fixes this bug.

@mattjones315 mattjones315 requested a review from colganwi March 7, 2024 21:47
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.84%. Comparing base (bb2fd4f) to head (dced953).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #238   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.84%   79.84%           
=======================================
  Files          90       90           
  Lines        8170     8173    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits         6523     6526    +3     
  Misses       1647     1647           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@colganwi colganwi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@colganwi colganwi merged commit 41dbff8 into master Mar 8, 2024
2 of 4 checks passed
@colganwi colganwi deleted the lca-reconstruct branch March 8, 2024 15:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants