-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hide the Classic block in the Site Editor #44554
Merged
michalczaplinski
merged 2 commits into
trunk
from
fix/disable-classic-block-in-site-editor
Sep 30, 2022
+21
−0
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did we try just unregistering (or not registering) the block instead of using a filter?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't!
Let me try it out quickly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see something quite strange: when not registering the block, three
core/freeform
blocks get inserted into the site editor:first_vid.mp4
trimmed_vid.mp4
Any idea why that might be? I now remember that I've seen this behaviour before when working on this PR which is why I've opted for the fix by using a filter but I didn't investigate the root cause.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess, it's something in the parser (probably related about the fallback block being used). Also makes me wonder what happens now in trunk when you edit the HTML of templates manually and add random stuff. Do we have a block that handles random HTML.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the widget editor there was also a situation where freeform blocks were inserted, but I think that only happened when pasting blocks. I guess it wasn't happening when loading content because the widget editor doesn't store blocks as html, while the site editor does.
The fix that was used in the widget editor was to use the html block as the freeform block (instead of the classic block). But that caused some other issues - no block delimiter for the html block and autop running on freeform content.
My suggestion for a longer term fix would be a new (non-classic) freeform block for the site and widget editors. It probably wouldn't be too difficult to implement, borrowing parts from the html and classic block.