-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Post Title: Add support for text decoration #38986
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -33,10 +33,19 @@ function render_block_core_post_title( $attributes, $content, $block ) { | |
$tag_name = 0 === $attributes['level'] ? 'p' : 'h' . $attributes['level']; | ||
} | ||
|
||
$wrapper_attributes = get_block_wrapper_attributes( array( 'class' => $align_class_name ) ); | ||
|
||
if ( isset( $attributes['isLink'] ) && $attributes['isLink'] ) { | ||
$title = sprintf( '<a href="%1$s" target="%2$s" rel="%3$s">%4$s</a>', get_the_permalink( $post_ID ), esc_attr( $attributes['linkTarget'] ), esc_attr( $attributes['rel'] ), $title ); | ||
return sprintf( | ||
'<%1$s><a href="%2$s" target="%3$s" rel="%4$s" %5$s>%6$s</a></%1$s>', | ||
$tag_name, | ||
get_the_permalink( $post_ID ), | ||
esc_attr( $attributes['linkTarget'] ), | ||
esc_attr( $attributes['rel'] ), | ||
$wrapper_attributes, | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We're now applying the |
||
$title | ||
); | ||
} | ||
$wrapper_attributes = get_block_wrapper_attributes( array( 'class' => $align_class_name ) ); | ||
|
||
return sprintf( | ||
'<%1$s %2$s>%3$s</%1$s>', | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where did
$tag_name
come from? Why do we now have a wrapping element?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Previously this was output to a
$title
variable.$title
was then wrapped in a wrapping element after the if statement.This change simply returns the whole markup rather than creating a variable, which I thought was easier to read than having multiple if statements.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I appreciate this might seem like a nit pick, but in order to keep this PR focused I really think we should go back to the previous setup whereby we had a single
return
statement.Why?
Having two
return
statements means the HTML output is effectively generated in x2 places thus increasingly the complexity of reasoning around the code. It also doubles the surface area for the introduction of XSS bugs (as evidenced by the original omission of theesc_*
functions in this PR).