refactor: bonding manager

[kerber0x]

Description and Motivation

This PR refactors the bonding manager, fixing a couple of issues with the bonding and claiming mechanisms. It also refactors the state, using an IndexedMap to hold both bonds and unbonds operations by a user.

Related Issues

---

Checklist:

• I have read Migaloo's contribution guidelines.
• My pull request has a sound title and description (not something vague like Update index.md)
• All existing and new tests are passing.
• I updated/added relevant documentation.
• The code is formatted properly cargo fmt --all --.
• Clippy doesn't report any issues cargo clippy -- -D warnings.
• I have regenerated the schemas if needed cargo schema.

[kerber0x]

This is turning to be an overhaul of the bonding manager, not just removing a single msg 😅

[github-actions]

Schema generation had missing jobs:

contracts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/schema/bonding-manager.json
contracts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/schema/raw/response_to_claimable.json
contracts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/schema/raw/response_to_global_index.json
contracts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/schema/raw/response_to_unbonding.json

Please run just schemas locally and upload the generated schemas.

[github-actions]

Schema generation had missing jobs:

contracts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/schema/bonding-manager.json
contracts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/schema/raw/response_to_claimable.json
contracts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/schema/raw/response_to_global_index.json
contracts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/schema/raw/response_to_unbonding.json

Please run just schemas locally and upload the generated schemas.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.92576% with 57 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.15%. Comparing base (0f77427) to head (1ac4516).
Report is 4 commits behind head on release/v2_contracts.

❗ Current head 1ac4516 differs from pull request most recent head 61ed894

Please upload reports for the commit 61ed894 to get more accurate results.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...y_hub/bonding-manager/src/tests/unbond_withdraw.rs	98.83%	10 Missing ⚠️
...racts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/src/helpers.rs	93.75%	9 Missing ⚠️
...s/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/src/tests/suite.rs	85.48%	9 Missing ⚠️
...s/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/src/tests/claim.rs	99.22%	5 Missing ⚠️
...acts/liquidity_hub/pool-manager/src/tests/suite.rs	86.48%	5 Missing ⚠️
...acts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/src/contract.rs	89.74%	4 Missing ⚠️
...uidity_hub/bonding-manager/src/bonding/commands.rs	97.47%	3 Missing ⚠️
...ts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/src/tests/bond.rs	92.68%	3 Missing ⚠️
...liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/src/tests/queries.rs	99.07%	2 Missing ⚠️
...ity_hub/bonding-manager/src/tests/update_config.rs	97.40%	2 Missing ⚠️
... and 4 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@                   Coverage Diff                    @@
##           release/v2_contracts     #352      +/-   ##
========================================================
+ Coverage                 90.09%   91.15%   +1.05%     
========================================================
  Files                       278      279       +1     
  Lines                     29604    31113    +1509     
========================================================
+ Hits                      26673    28361    +1688     
+ Misses                     2931     2752     -179     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Schema generation had missing jobs:

contracts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/schema/bonding-manager.json
contracts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/schema/raw/response_to_bonded.json
contracts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/schema/raw/response_to_claimable.json
contracts/liquidity_hub/bonding-manager/schema/raw/response_to_unbonding.json

Please run just schemas locally and upload the generated schemas.

[0xFable]

LGTM, massive work here ser! Changes look good see you put in a shift reorganising some things too thats very much appreciated will make future features easier to get in.
A couple comments but overall looks class and want to see him merged
🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀 🚀

[nseguias]

Looks good to me. Made some comments to improve the code and some questions to make sure I understand things right. Awesome work! Love seeing some convoluted tests. Once we're done we should write a big test that tries every part of the code ⭐